|
Difference between
version 11
and
version 10:
| Removed line 150 |
| - * And ... |
| At line 151 added 1 line. |
| + * Discussion about the need for sample data to be able to show end-to-end connectivity and workflow with concepts. |
| At line 152 added 16 lines. |
| + ** Bob, Alan Weakly has 6500 taxa, 8 classifications; just having two classfications (MSW) with just names is likely |
| + not enough, we need comprehensive data sets with many characters, over time. |
| + ** Bob, we have all of data for the classifications for Juglandaceae (trees). Also have complete Ranunculus data, with full concept information. bob committed to producing some data for the TOS by about the end of June. |
| + |
| + ** Discussion of bat data, bat people, value in finding some bat survey and observation data sets that could be marked up. |
| + |
| + ** Jim offered to pursue some bat leads. Talk to Bob Timm (KU), Don Wilson (USNM), MSW bat treatment author, possibly Texas Tech lab. |
| + |
| + ** Dave, what about searching EML data sets for taxonomic names? Aimmee-did that, not much there. |
| + |
| + ** Rich Pyle once offered (we think) angel fish concept, data, we could check to see if that is still on the table. |
| + |
| + ** Dave Thau, someone mused, likely also has ant data concepts from the Ant web project. |
| + |
| + |
| + |
Back to All Hands Meeting 2006 Notes,
or to the Page History.
|
