Lines 1-14 were replaced by lines 1-40 |
- __What are our software development priorities?__ |
- * finish/improve current work on TOS |
- ** update object model |
- ** finish the parser |
- ** use Hibernate for database abstraction |
- ** add MSW data, changes over time, in TCS format |
- ** make SOAP server more robust (1 week max) |
- * new functionality for TOS |
- ** API's to receive and output TCS and OWL |
- ** Kepler actor? |
- ** Integrate LSID server into |
- * Visualization Browsing and Editing Tools |
- ** Browser within 6 mos |
- ** Editing within 9 months? |
+ !!What are our software development priorities? |
+ |
+ __Organize!__ |
+ * Draw dependency diagram of tasks with names (wiki) - get input from responsible parties (Aimee, Thau) |
+ * Add API calls to WIKI page next to WSDL link, update as needed (Aimee - DONE) |
+ |
+ __Finish/improve current work on TOS__ |
+ * update object model |
+ ** Pre: Decide on version of TCS to work from for now (Trevor, Aimee) |
+ * finish the parser |
+ * use Hibernate for database abstraction |
+ * make SOAP server more robust (1 week max) |
+ * Integrate LSID server (Thau, Robert, Aimee) |
+ * add MSW data, changes over time, in TCS format |
+ |
+ __New functionality for TOS__ |
+ * API's to receive and output TCS and OWL |
+ * Kepler actor? |
+ * Algorithms (Aimee, Robert, experts) |
+ |
+ __TCS work__ |
+ * Jessie will meet with Paul Kirk to discuss variation in valid name types and generate an appropriate schema with list of examples (2 weeks)(Name Work) |
+ * Map between TCS, DarwinCore, EML (Trevor) |
+ *** Pre: Name Work above |
+ |
+ __Tools: Visualization, Browsing, and Editing Tools__ |
+ * Bob, Nico and Xianhua will summarize issues on wiki (2 weeks) |
+ ** 3 timeframes (January, semi-short, long) |
+ ** look at Napier work/proposal and see if/how they can work together |
+ ** Who are the users of each tool? |
+ ** Use cases for Tools |
+ * Should we have seperate browsing/editing tools? There should be coordination between the 2 - not different displays for user to view |
+ * Tool for marking up EML datasets with concepts |
+ ** Pre: modification of EML taxonomic section |
+ ** manual/auto markup of dataset metadata |
+ * Tool for adding relationships between existing concepts |
+ ** How does current work fit in? |
+ *** Napier's (Martin) visualization tool for tree comparison - doesn't edit |
+ *** Xianhua's TaCBE tool, browsing and editing - where does this fit in? |
+ * Tool for creating new concepts |
Lines 18-28 were replaced by lines 44-90 |
- ** Should we have seperate tools? There should be coordination between the 2 - not different displays for user to view |
- ** How does current work fit in? |
- *** Xianhua's TaCBE tool, browsing and editing - where does this fit in? |
- *** Napier's (Martin) visualization tool for tree comparison - doesn't edit |
- * Dataset markup tools |
- ** modification of EML taxonomic section |
- ** allow manual markup of dataset metadata |
- ** auto markup |
- * Napier |
- ** tool to define mappings from other dbs to TCS |
- *** will look at MapForce |
+ ** User Guide: Walk the experts through the concept creation steps() |
+ * Tool to define mappings from other dbs to TCS (Trevor) |
+ ** will look at MapForce |
+ |
+ __SEEK Integration Tasks__ |
+ * Find experts, Mark S. will talk to Jim Richman and ?? about bat data |
+ ** Nico - Identify 1-5 taxa to target (with Mark and Deana identifying ecological datasets and markup in EML with Taxonomic Concepts) |
+ *** Pre: Dave Thau will narrow the field by looking at MaNIS for families with lots of georeferencing data (Nov 12 or so) to help identify taxa |
+ *** Pre: Town will help narrow the field with experts |
+ ** Jessie and Trevor will look for taxonomic databases to help identify taxa |
+ ** Experts to help map relationships b/w historical concepts (who?) |
+ *** Pre: Broad guidelines first, then experts will help modify. Example driven guidelines for experts - beginning of User Guide (Nico, Trevor, Bob, Jessie) |
+ ** Create TCS doc for import of concept data into SEEK Taxon cache (Nico, Jessie) |
+ ** Dave V. will help from Ecogrid perspective |
+ |
+ * Dataset annotation (learning step) |
+ ** Test concept dataset generation (name, source) (Jessie, Trevor, Thau) |
+ ** Generate LSIDs for the concepts within (Thau) |
+ ** Annotation of EML with test concepts (Matt, Thau) |
+ ** Maybe use controlled vocabulary (Smithsonian?) |
+ |
+ * Integrate functionality of TOS with Kepler (Robert, Aimee, Thau) |
+ ** Learn Kepler |
+ ** Determine what actors to build |
+ |
+ __LONG Term__ |
+ * integrate TOS with Ecogrid |
+ ** Incorporate TOS into current data queries |
+ *** smart searching - currently divided into 2 searches, need to integrate SMS and Taxon searching |
+ ** Aggregation node vs individual providers, regularly scheduled updates |
+ |
+ * Modify taxonomic part of EML (Matt, Jessie) |
+ ** Can use additionalMetadata with no changes to EML tools for experimentation |
+ ** Could use simple name/rank/publication composite key with/without LSID |
+ *** Pre: Name Work above |
+ ** Using only LSID might be best long-term solution |
+ |
+ * Integrate dataset annotation with TOS |
+ ** Pre: SMS annotation for smart data discovery |
+ ** Pre: EML modification |
+ ** 2 types: Ecological datasets vs specimen datasets |
+ ** How do we annotate datasets - metadata generation |
+ ** Modify Morpho tool which is pulling taxonomic names/info from datasets to use TOS for concept matching |
+ ** How do we interface with ecological dataset creators that don't use Morpho? |
+ |
+ * How do we use the rich TOS result to query on DiGIR resources with sparsely populated taxonomic information? |
+ * Annotate Darwin Core records with proxy - LSIDs for specimen records and Concept LSID |
At line 29 added 7 lines. |
+ __Publications__ |
+ * concept language - Nico, Bob, Jessie (1 month) |
+ * for Ecologists - Trevor, Bob, Nico () |
+ * General SEEK Taxon paper, where the field is going (Beach) (not begun) |
+ * QRB (submitted) |
+ * Concepts and GUIDs (Systematics Biology - Nico, Thau, Jessie) (3 months for internal review) |
+ * Technical aspects of concepts and GUIDs (Thau and ??) (not begun) |