| At line 2 added 4 lines. |
| + __Organize!__ |
| + * Draw dependency diagram of tasks with names (wiki) - get input from responsible parties (Aimee, Thau) |
| + * Add API calls to WIKI page next to WSDL link, update as needed (Aimee - DONE) |
| + |
| Removed line 8 |
| - * add MSW data, changes over time, in TCS format |
| Line 10 was replaced by lines 13-15 |
| - |
| + * Integrate LSID server (Thau, Robert, Aimee) |
| + * add MSW data, changes over time, in TCS format |
| + |
| Lines 14-33 were replaced by line 19 |
| - * Integrate LSID server into |
| - |
| - __TCS work__ |
| - * Jessie will meet with Paul Kirk to discuss variation in valid name types and generate an appropriate schema with list of examples (2 weeks) |
| - |
| - __Visualization Browsing and Editing Tools__ |
| - * Browser within 6 mos |
| - * Editing within 9 months? |
| - * What kind of editing tools are needed? |
| - ** single concept |
| - ** batch addition, editing |
| - * Should we have seperate tools? There should be coordination between the 2 - not different displays for user to view |
| - * How does current work fit in? |
| - ** Xianhua's TaCBE tool, browsing and editing - where does this fit in? |
| - ** Napier's (Martin) visualization tool for tree comparison - doesn't edit |
| - |
| - __Dataset markup tools__ |
| - * modification of EML taxonomic section |
| - * allow manual markup of dataset metadata |
| - * auto markup |
| + * Algorithms (Aimee, Robert, experts) |
| Lines 35-36 were replaced by lines 21-45 |
| - __Napier__ |
| - * tool to define mappings from other dbs to TCS |
| + __TCS work__ |
| + * Jessie will meet with Paul Kirk to discuss variation in valid name types and generate an appropriate schema with list of examples (2 weeks)(Name Work) |
| + * Map between TCS, DarwinCore, EML (Trevor) |
| + *** Pre: Name Work above |
| + |
| + __Tools: Visualization, Browsing, and Editing Tools__ |
| + * Bob, Nico and Xianhua will summarize issues on wiki (2 weeks) |
| + ** 3 timeframes (January, semi-short, long) |
| + ** look at Napier work/proposal and see if/how they can work together |
| + ** Who are the users of each tool? |
| + ** Use cases for Tools |
| + * Should we have seperate browsing/editing tools? There should be coordination between the 2 - not different displays for user to view |
| + * Tool for marking up EML datasets with concepts |
| + ** Pre: modification of EML taxonomic section |
| + ** manual/auto markup of dataset metadata |
| + * Tool for adding relationships between existing concepts |
| + ** How does current work fit in? |
| + *** Napier's (Martin) visualization tool for tree comparison - doesn't edit |
| + *** Xianhua's TaCBE tool, browsing and editing - where does this fit in? |
| + * Tool for creating new concepts |
| + ** What kind of editing tools are needed? |
| + *** single concept |
| + *** batch addition, editing |
| + ** User Guide: Walk the experts through the concept creation steps() |
| + * Tool to define mappings from other dbs to TCS (Trevor) |
| Removed line 45 |
| - ** Populate concepts for those taxa |
| Lines 51-52 were replaced by lines 59-63 |
| - * Tool for Concept creation |
| - ** Walk the experts through the concept creation steps - User Guide () |
| + * Dataset annotation (learning step) |
| + ** Test concept dataset generation (name, source) (Jessie, Trevor, Thau) |
| + ** Generate LSIDs for the concepts within (Thau) |
| + ** Annotation of EML with test concepts (Matt, Thau) |
| + ** Maybe use controlled vocabulary (Smithsonian?) |
| Line 54 was replaced by line 65 |
| - * integrate functionality of TOS with Kepler (Robert, Aimee, Thau) |
| + * Integrate functionality of TOS with Kepler (Robert, Aimee, Thau) |
| At line 63 added 6 lines. |
| + * Modify taxonomic part of EML (Matt, Jessie) |
| + ** Can use additionalMetadata with no changes to EML tools for experimentation |
| + ** Could use simple name/rank/publication composite key with/without LSID |
| + *** Pre: Name Work above |
| + ** Using only LSID might be best long-term solution |
| + |
| At line 64 added 3 lines. |
| + ** Pre: SMS annotation for smart data discovery |
| + ** Pre: EML modification |
| + ** 2 types: Ecological datasets vs specimen datasets |
| Removed line 67 |
| - ** Ecological datasets vs specimen datasets |
| At line 68 added 1 line. |
| + |
| Lines 72-82 were replaced by lines 92-98 |
| - * Modify taxonomic part of EML |
| - ** Can use additionalMetadata with no changes to EML tools for experimentation |
| - ** Could use simple name/rank/publication composite key with/without LSID |
| - *** Pre: Jessie's work on Name with Paul Kirk |
| - ** Using only LSID might be best long-term solution |
| - |
| - ** Maybe use controlled vocabulary (Smithsonian?) |
| - |
| - |
| - * Map between TCS, DarwinCore, EML (Jessie) |
| - |
| + __Publications__ |
| + * concept language - Nico, Bob, Jessie (1 month) |
| + * for Ecologists - Trevor, Bob, Nico () |
| + * General SEEK Taxon paper, where the field is going (Beach) (not begun) |
| + * QRB (submitted) |
| + * Concepts and GUIDs (Systematics Biology - Nico, Thau, Jessie) (3 months for internal review) |
| + * Technical aspects of concepts and GUIDs (Thau and ??) (not begun) |
