| At line 0 added 3 lines. |
| + !!!Participants |
| + Jones, Tao, Rajasekar, Zhu, Brunt, Servilla, Tekell, Spears |
| + |
| Line 4 was replaced by line 7 |
| - ** Interfaces adequate? |
| + ** [WSDL Interfaces|http://kuecogrid.ittc.ku.edu:8080/ogsa/schema/org.ecoinformatics.ecogrid.registry/EcoRegInterface/EcoRegInterface_bindings.wsdl] adequate? |
| Removed line 8 |
| - # Identifiers: use ours, or LSID, and implement! |
| At line 9 added 7 lines. |
| + ** Environemntal data for BEAM |
| + # [Identifiers|EcoGridIdentifiers]: use ours, or LSID, and implement! |
| + # Update on EcoGrid Web UI design (Tekell) [EcoGridWebDesignNotes] |
| + |
| + These topics were delayed until next meeting |
| + # Certificates and authentication |
| + ** see [CertificateAuthorityDesign] for background |
| At line 10 added 1 line. |
| + ** handling EML version changes (2.0.0 vs. 2.0.1) |
| Line 12 was replaced by lines 22-60 |
| - # Update on data query/subset functionality |
| + # Update on data query/subset functionality (Tao) |
| + # Update on put interface implementation (Zhu) |
| + |
| + !!! Notes |
| + |
| + # EcoGrid registry |
| + ** need registry metadata |
| + *** Raja suggests need name-value pairs |
| + *** previously discussed need for structured metadata, including coverage, but hard to keep updated |
| + *** Raja argues the more structured registry metadata is not needed, at least from the UI perspective |
| + ** Do we need to reimplement using globus? Probably not? Globus registry still not presistent. Our metacat implementation is persistent. |
| + ** Are there specific metadata fields we need to help users choose nodes to search |
| + ** Action items |
| + *** Extend registry metadata to accept xml metadata documents (Bing, Rod) |
| + *** Establish short list of standard attributes, extend UI to accomodate them (Bing, Rod, Matt) |
| + **** Start at Dublin core and extend it |
| + *** Fill out metadata for specific nodes (Bing, Rod) |
| + *** Make registries broadcast new registration change events (Bing, but lowest priority) |
| + # EML Metadata for SRB-stored data sets |
| + ** Option 1: store EML in metacat and point at SRB object (preferred) |
| + *** Figure out where Deana is storing her data (same as LTER)? |
| + *** How to coordinate authentication and access control |
| + **** Use GSI certificates |
| + **** Synchronize SRB/Metacat user lists and access control changes |
| + ** Action items |
| + *** Contact Deana about putting data in SRB and metadata in Metacat (Matt) |
| + *** Verify that accounts can be synchronized between Metacat and SRB (Bing) |
| + # Identifiers |
| + ** Agreed on using LSID format for all EcoGrid identifiers |
| + *** need to retrofit existing EcoGrid services to use them |
| + ** Action items |
| + *** Fix get, put, query to use LSIDs everywhere (Bing, after registry stuff) |
| + *** Coordinate with Thau on establishing an LSID server (Rod) |
| + *** Talk with Dave Vieglais about using LSID's for Darwin Core records (Matt) |
| + # Overview of Ecogrid web UI |
| + ** Tekell gave overview of progress (see page linked above) |
| + ** has need for EcoGrid Level II interfaces to do resultset merging |
| + ** Q: do we have interfaces defined for getting summary counts back instead of results |
| + # Next Conference call: September 17, 2004 11am PDT |
