| Lines 52-76 were replaced by line 52 |
| - What are our software development priorities? |
| - * finish/improve current work on TOS |
| - ** update object model |
| - ** finish the parser |
| - ** use Hibernate for database abstraction |
| - ** add MSW data, changes over time, in TCS format |
| - ** make SOAP server more robust (1 week max) |
| - * new functionality for TOS |
| - ** API's to receive and output TCS and OWL |
| - ** Kepler actor? |
| - * with Thau too |
| - ** Integrate LSID server into |
| - * Visualization |
| - ** Xianhua's TCBE tool - where does this fit in? |
| - ** Napier's (Martin) visualization tool for tree comparison |
| - ** Editing tools |
| - *** |
| - * Dataset markup tools |
| - ** modification of EML taxonomic section |
| - ** allow manual markup of dataset metadata |
| - ** auto markup |
| - * Napier |
| - ** tool to define mappings from other dbs to TCS |
| - *** will look at MapForce |
| - ** |
| + [DevelopmentTasksNov2004] |
| At line 77 added 18 lines. |
| + __Miscellaneous notes from thau__ |
| + |
| + information in versioning systems have: |
| + *public versions |
| + *private versions |
| + *working versions |
| + |
| + might be nice to incorporate this notion into the lsid server |
| + |
| + questions that come up when looking at browser tools |
| + |
| + * who are the users? |
| + * what visual representions do the users want? tree, graph, touch-graph? |
| + * what work are we trying to make more efficient and how is that work done? |
| + * what is the relationship between the visualization and editing tool? |
| + |
| + note from jessie on point 2 - we found that taxonomists like trees, even though the underlying data model is a graph I published on this |
| + |
