Lines 52-79 were replaced by line 52 |
- What are our software development priorities? |
- * finish/improve current work on TOS |
- ** update object model |
- ** finish the parser |
- ** use Hibernate for database abstraction |
- ** add MSW data, changes over time, in TCS format |
- ** make SOAP server more robust (1 week max) |
- * new functionality for TOS |
- ** API's to receive and output TCS and OWL |
- ** Kepler actor? |
- ** Integrate LSID server into |
- * Visualization Browsing and Editing Tools |
- ** Browser within 6 mos |
- ** Editing within 9 months? |
- ** What kind of editing tools are needed? |
- *** single concept |
- *** batch addition, editing |
- ** Should we have seperate tools? There should be coordination between the 2 - not different displays for user to view |
- ** How does current work fit in? |
- *** Xianhua's TaCBE tool, browsing and editing - where does this fit in? |
- *** Napier's (Martin) visualization tool for tree comparison - doesn't edit |
- * Dataset markup tools |
- ** modification of EML taxonomic section |
- ** allow manual markup of dataset metadata |
- ** auto markup |
- * Napier |
- ** tool to define mappings from other dbs to TCS |
- *** will look at MapForce |
+ [DevelopmentTasksNov2004] |
At line 80 added 18 lines. |
+ __Miscellaneous notes from thau__ |
+ |
+ information in versioning systems have: |
+ *public versions |
+ *private versions |
+ *working versions |
+ |
+ might be nice to incorporate this notion into the lsid server |
+ |
+ questions that come up when looking at browser tools |
+ |
+ * who are the users? |
+ * what visual representions do the users want? tree, graph, touch-graph? |
+ * what work are we trying to make more efficient and how is that work done? |
+ * what is the relationship between the visualization and editing tool? |
+ |
+ note from jessie on point 2 - we found that taxonomists like trees, even though the underlying data model is a graph I published on this |
+ |