|
Difference between
version 30
and
version 29:
| Line 82 was replaced by line 82 |
| - [#1] The term "SpatialSpeciesDistributionModel" is highly specialized. In practice, such terms are more likely than not described, or "built from" existing terms and ontology structures. For example, the notion of a "Model" may be explicitly captured by an ontology, where a "Model" is a complex structure having sub-parts. In this example, the term "SpatialSpeciesDistributionModel" may be explicitly defined within the ontology, or even implicitly defined by the annotation itself, as being a "Model" that "computes" the "SpatialDistribution" of a set of "Species". |
| + [#1] The term "SpatialSpeciesDistributionModel" is highly specialized. In practice, such terms are more likely than not described, or "built from" existing terms and ontology structures. For example, the notion of a "Model" may be explicitly captured by an ontology, where a "Model" is a composite structure having multiple parts. In this example, the term "SpatialSpeciesDistributionModel" may be explicitly defined within the ontology, or even implicitly defined by the annotation itself as being a "Model" that "computes" the "SpatialDistribution" of a set of "Species". |
Back to Semantics In Kepler,
or to the Page History.
|
