| Line 10 was replaced by line 10 |
| - Sparrow is a description-logic syntax that is meant as a "lightweight" alternative to RDF/S and OWL for defining ontologies. This document details the sparrow syntax. |
| + Sparrow is a description-logic syntax that is meant as a "lightweight" alternative to RDF/S and OWL for defining ontologies. This document details the sparrow syntax. Note that in terms of expressivity, sparrow lies between RDF/S and OWL-DL. |
| Line 12 was replaced by line 12 |
| - !!! Sparrow |
| + !!! Sparrow |
| Line 14 was replaced by line 14 |
| - Sparrow ontologies, like description-logic ontologies, define concepts, roles, individuals, and properties. |
| + Sparrow, like description logics, represent ontologies using concepts, roles, and individuals. We desribe each of these below. |
| Line 16 was replaced by line 16 |
| - !! Basic Concept Definitions |
| + !! Concepts |
| Line 18 was replaced by line 18 |
| - Concepts in sparrow are defined using ''sentences.'' For instance, we can introduce a new concept called 'vegetarian' into an ontology using the following sentence. |
| + In sparrow, concepts are defined using ''sentences.'' For instance, we can introduce a new concept called 'Vegetarian' using the following sentence. |
| Line 24 was replaced by line 24 |
| - This sentence simply states that the term 'Vegetarian' is a concept. In the above sentence, the term 'concept' is a reserved word. We can give further elaborate concepts using ''concept axioms,'' for example: |
| + This sentence simply states that the 'Vegetarian' is a concept. Note that the term 'concept' is a reserved word in the sparrow language. A concept can be further elaborated using ''concept axioms,'' which are essentially more complex sentences of a restricted form. Consider the following example. |
| Line 27 was replaced by line 27 |
| - concept Animal kind_of Organism |
| + concept Animal kind-of Organism |
| Line 30 was replaced by line 30 |
| - This sentence states that the term 'Animal' is a sub-concept of the concept 'Organism'. In other words, every animal is an organism. The term 'kind_of' is a reserved word. Both 'Animal' and 'Organism' are asserted as being concepts by this sentence. The sentence is equivalent to the following three sparrow sentences. |
| + This sentence states that 'Animal' is a subconcept of 'Organism'. In other words, every animal is an organism. The term 'kind-of' is a reserved word (sometimes referred to as "is-a"). The sentence is considered an axiom because it is asserting a rule, or relationship, that is assumed to hold between 'Animal' and 'Organism'. Namely, that being an animal implies being an organism. |
| At line 31 added 2 lines. |
| + Both 'Animal' and 'Organism' are asserted as being concepts by this sentence. The sentence is equivalent to the following three sparrow sentences. |
| + |
| Line 35 was replaced by line 37 |
| - concept Animal kind_of Organism. |
| + concept Animal kind-of Organism |
| Line 38 was replaced by line 40 |
| - Multiple sentences defining the same concept are combined through conjunction (and). For example, the sentences: |
| + Multiple sentences defining the same concept can be combined through conjunction (and). For example, the sentences: |
| Lines 41-45 were replaced by lines 43-44 |
| - concept Organism |
| - concept Animal |
| - concept Plant |
| - concept Animal kind_of Organism |
| - concept Animal kind_of not Plant |
| + concept Animal kind-of Organism |
| + concept Animal kind-of not Plant |
| Line 51 was replaced by line 50 |
| - concept Animal kind_of Organism and not Plant |
| + concept Animal kind-of Organism and not Plant |
| Line 54 was replaced by lines 53-57 |
| - That is, an animal is an organism but not a plant. The terms 'and' and 'not' are sparrow reserved words. |
| + Here the terms 'and' and 'not' are sparrow reserved words. The sentence states that an animal is an organism but not a plant. For convenience, 'and' can be replaced by the term 'but', for example: |
| + |
| + {{{ |
| + concept Animal kind-of Organism but not Plant |
| + }}} |
| Line 59 was replaced by lines 62-79 |
| - CONCEPT animal KIND_OF organism AND NOT plant |
| + CONCEPT animal KIND-OF organism BUT NOT plant |
| + }}} |
| + |
| + Another type of concept axiom that can be expressed in sparrow is equivalence among concepts. For example, consider the following sentence. |
| + |
| + {{{ |
| + concept Human same-as Person |
| + }}} |
| + |
| + This sentence asserts that 'Human' and 'Person' denote the same concept. |
| + |
| + |
| + !! Roles |
| + |
| + A more complex example ... |
| + |
| + {{{ |
| + concept Macromolecule same-as Molecule that contains at-least 100 Atom |
| Line 62 was replaced by line 82 |
| - !!! Complex Concept Definitions |
| + |
| At line 63 added 1 line. |
| + !! Individuals |
| At line 65 added 1 line. |
| + |
| Line 68 was replaced by line 90 |
| - A sparrow ontology consists of one or more sparrow sentences. The following two sentences define |
| + A sparrow ontology is made up of a set of sparrow sentences. Typically an ontology would be stored in a single file, however, a file could conceivable store multiple ontologies. An ontology is started with the 'ontology' reserved word. An ontology can import definitions from other ontologies. The following example starts an ontology definition and imports an external ontology. |
| Lines 71-72 were replaced by lines 93-97 |
| - sparrow define myOnt uri 'http://seek.ecoinformatics.org/#myOnt' |
| - sparrow import yourOnt uri 'http://seek.ecoinformatic.org/#yourOnt' |
| + ontology myOnt 'http://seek.ecoinformatics.org/ontology1#' |
| + import yourOnt 'http://seek.ecoinformatics.org/ontology2#' |
| + |
| + ... |
| + |
| At line 73 added 5 lines. |
| + |
| + !!! Sparrow Reserved Wordsf |
| + |
| + ||reserved word||variant |
| + | and | but, that |
