| Line 10 was replaced by line 10 |
| - Sparrow is a description-logic variant that is meant as a "lightweight" alternative to RDF/S and OWL for defining ontologies. This document describes the syntax of sparrow. |
| + Sparrow is a description-logic syntax that is meant as a "lightweight" alternative to RDF/S and OWL for defining ontologies. This document details the sparrow syntax. Note that in terms of expressivity, sparrow lies between RDF/S and OWL-DL. |
| Line 12 was replaced by line 12 |
| - !!! Basic Sparrow |
| + !!! Sparrow |
| Line 14 was replaced by line 14 |
| - Concepts and roles in sparrow are defined using sentences. New concepts can be "created" using the following sentence. |
| + Sparrow, like description logics, represent ontologies using concepts, roles, and individuals. We desribe each of these below. |
| At line 15 added 33 lines. |
| + !! Concepts |
| + |
| + In sparrow, concepts are defined using ''sentences.'' For instance, we can introduce a new concept called 'Vegetarian' using the following sentence. |
| + |
| + {{{ |
| + concept Vegetarian |
| + }}} |
| + |
| + This sentence simply states that the 'Vegetarian' is a concept. Note that the term 'concept' is a reserved word in the sparrow language. A concept can be further elaborated using ''concept axioms,'' which are essentially more complex sentences of a restricted form. Consider the following example. |
| + |
| + {{{ |
| + concept Animal kind-of Organism |
| + }}} |
| + |
| + This sentence states that 'Animal' is a subconcept of 'Organism'. In other words, every animal is an organism. The term 'kind-of' is a reserved word (sometimes referred to as "is-a"). The sentence is considered an axiom because it is asserting a rule, or relationship, that is assumed to hold between 'Animal' and 'Organism'. Namely, that being an animal implies being an organism. |
| + |
| + Both 'Animal' and 'Organism' are asserted as being concepts by this sentence. The sentence is equivalent to the following three sparrow sentences. |
| + |
| + {{{ |
| + concept Organism |
| + concept Animal |
| + concept Animal kind-of Organism |
| + }}} |
| + |
| + Multiple sentences defining the same concept can be combined through conjunction (and). For example, the sentences: |
| + |
| + {{{ |
| + concept Animal kind-of Organism |
| + concept Animal kind-of not Plant |
| + }}} |
| + |
| + can be combined into the sentence: |
| + |
| Line 17 was replaced by line 50 |
| - concept vegetarian. |
| + concept Animal kind-of Organism and not Plant |
| Line 20 was replaced by line 53 |
| - This sentence simply states that the term 'vegetarian' is a concept. Instead, we can give more details by defining concepts. |
| + Here the terms 'and' and 'not' are sparrow reserved words. The sentence states that an animal is an organism but not a plant. For convenience, 'and' can be replaced by the term 'but', for example: |
| Line 23 was replaced by line 56 |
| - concept animal is_a organism. |
| + concept Animal kind-of Organism but not Plant |
| Line 26 was replaced by line 59 |
| - This sentence states that the term 'animal' is a sub-concept of the concept 'organism'. In this example, both 'animal' and 'organism' are asserted as being concepts. In other words, the above expression is equivalent to the following three expressions in sparrow. |
| + Capitalization is not important in sparrow, thus the previous sentence is equivalent to: |
| Lines 29-31 were replaced by line 62 |
| - concept organism. |
| - concept animal. |
| - concept animal is_a organism. |
| + CONCEPT animal KIND-OF organism BUT NOT plant |
| At line 33 added 1 line. |
| + Another type of concept axiom that can be expressed in sparrow is equivalence among concepts. For example, consider the following sentence. |
| At line 34 added 14 lines. |
| + {{{ |
| + concept Human same-as Person |
| + }}} |
| + |
| + This sentence asserts that 'Human' and 'Person' denote the same concept. |
| + |
| + |
| + !! Roles |
| + |
| + A more complex example ... |
| + |
| + {{{ |
| + concept Macromolecule same-as Molecule that contains at-least 100 Atom |
| + }}} |
| At line 35 added 6 lines. |
| + |
| + |
| + !! Individuals |
| + |
| + |
| + |
| Line 38 was replaced by line 90 |
| - A sparrow ontology consists of one or more sparrow sentences. The following two sentences define |
| + A sparrow ontology is made up of a set of sparrow sentences. Typically an ontology would be stored in a single file, however, a file could conceivable store multiple ontologies. An ontology is started with the 'ontology' reserved word. An ontology can import definitions from other ontologies. The following example starts an ontology definition and imports an external ontology. |
| Lines 41-42 were replaced by lines 93-97 |
| - sparrow define myOnt uri 'http://seek.ecoinformatics.org/#myOnt' |
| - sparrow import yourOnt uri 'http://seek.ecoinformatic.org/#yourOnt' |
| + ontology myOnt 'http://seek.ecoinformatics.org/ontology1#' |
| + import yourOnt 'http://seek.ecoinformatics.org/ontology2#' |
| + |
| + ... |
| + |
| At line 43 added 5 lines. |
| + |
| + !!! Sparrow Reserved Wordsf |
| + |
| + ||reserved word||variant |
| + | and | but, that |
