Difference between
version 20
and
version 14:
Line 17 was replaced by lines 17-19 |
- ;GUID meeting: Jessie offered SEEK Taxon to be an LSID authority. GBIF now has 6 Java programmers building a Taxon db. Jessie put in proposal to Moore Foundation for documentation and standards, got funding but to do something else working with/for Donald/Roger. Lots of opportunities to collaborate on development. |
+ ;GUID meeting: Report - LSID, RDF agreed upon. Concerns about scalability of RDF. Use cases on GBIF website for GUIDs and Specimens. Sally sent email about GUIDs and Concepts. Jessie offered SEEK Taxon to be an LSID authority. GBIF now has 6 Java programmers building a Taxon db. They have LSID server, ITIS data -> concepts and some Taxon APIs returning TCS docs. Another GUID meeting in May. Matt volunteered SEEK for observation datasets/LSIDs - and wants to use LSIDs for workflow pieces. |
+ ;: Who will define what gets a GUID? Community rules for assigning GUIDs? Can issue for your own concepts with no questions. Historical concepts more problematic - who gets to define these - don't want multiple definitions of the same legacy data. What is metadata and what is part of GUID? |
+ ;:Jessie put in proposal to Moore Foundation for documentation and standards, got funding but to do something else working with/for Donald/Roger. Lots of opportunities to collaborate on development - why have SEEK Taxon/GBIF not been able to get together on this yet? |
At line 18 added 1 line. |
+ ;SEEK Taxon in other projects: Jim: Anthropologist in Arizona wants to use TOS for his project. Stinger: New plants project will use LSIDs, concepts. |
Line 20 was replaced by line 23 |
- ;Next call: Discuss NSF Review presentation. |
+ ;Next call: March 15, same time. Discuss NSF Review presentation. Say Happy Birthday to Laura! |
Back to Taxon WG Conference Call_22 Feb 2006,
or to the Page History.
|