|
|||
|
This is version 9.
It is not the current version, and thus it cannot be edited. Intended audienceThis document is intended for SEEK and Kepler developers. It is a DRAFT DESIGN DOCUMENT and does not reflect functionality as it currently exists in Kepler or SEEK. Comments and feedback are appreciated.
IntroductionSparrow is a description-logic variant that is meant as a "lightweight" alternative to RDF/S and OWL for defining ontologies. This document describes the syntax of sparrow.
SparrowSparrow ontologies, like description-logic ontologies, define concepts, roles, individuals, and properties.
Basics: Simple Concept DefinitionsConcepts in sparrow are defined using sentences. For instance, we can introduce a new concept called 'vegetarian' into an ontology using the following sentence.
concept vegetarian. This sentence simply states that the term 'vegetarian' is a concept. Instead, we can give more details by defining concepts.
concept animal is_a organism. This sentence states that the term 'animal' is a sub-concept of the concept 'organism'. In other words, every animal is an organism. Both 'animal' and 'organism' are asserted as being concepts by this sentence. The sentence is equivalent to the following three sparrow sentences.
concept organism. concept animal. concept animal is_a organism. Multiple sentences about the same concept are combined through conjunction (and). For example, the sentences:
concept organism. concept animal. concept plant. concept animal is_a organism. concept animal is_a not plant. can be combined into the equivalent sentence:
concept animal is_a organism and not plant. In other words, an animal is an organism but not a plant.
Packaging Sparrow OntologiesA sparrow ontology consists of one or more sparrow sentences. The following two sentences define
sparrow define myOnt uri 'http://seek.ecoinformatics.org/#myOnt' sparrow import yourOnt uri 'http://seek.ecoinformatic.org/#yourOnt'
|
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under award 0225676. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recomendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation (NSF). Copyright 2004 Partnership for Biodiversity Informatics, University of New Mexico, The Regents of the University of California, and University of Kansas |