Line 1 was replaced by line 1 |
- ! November 2, 2004 |
+ Notes created by Shawn Bowers |
At line 2 added 14 lines. |
+ ! Tuesday, Nov. 2, 2004 |
+ |
+ |
+ * 8:30 - 9:00 |
+ ** Jim Beach on today's schedule; politics in Kansas primer |
+ ** Guest from NatureServe (Gwynn ...) |
+ ** Mike Frame from USGS |
+ ** Liz Blood from NSF (not here yet ...) |
+ ** NCSA ... |
+ ** New Folks |
+ *** Laura Downey (unm, usability engineer) |
+ *** Jianting Zhang (postdoc, unm) |
+ *** Steve Teckell (seek web-developer) |
+ *** Mark Serilla (LTER, network information system) |
At line 4 added 149 lines. |
+ *** Matt Jones |
+ **** Kepler |
+ ***** Goal is to: create powerful analytical tools that is useful across disciplines; ecology, biology, engineering, geology, physics, ... |
+ ***** Model the way scientists work w/ their data now: mentally coordinate export and import of data among software systems |
+ ***** Workflows emphasize data flow |
+ ***** metadata-driven data ingestion |
+ ***** output generation includes creating appropriate metadata |
+ **** Kepler Today |
+ ***** EcoGrid support: EML data support; DarwinCore data support; EcoGrid registry to discover data sources |
+ ***** Ontology-based browsing |
+ ***** Demonstration workflows |
+ ****** Ecological niche models |
+ ****** Biodiversity analysis tools |
+ **** EcoGrid queries ... |
+ **** EcoGrid: EML Data Access |
+ **** Right-click data box to get EML metadata display |
+ **** Query builder |
+ ***** QBE style query |
+ ***** Query execution: EML Metadata + Data -> generate DDL to create temp dbs -> HSQL executes data -> result |
+ **** EcoGrid DarwinCore Access |
+ **** Actor Search and Browse: support multiple views (tuned to ecologist) ... switchable at runtime |
+ **** Kepler for Ecological Modeling |
+ **** Biodiversity indices (from Dan) |
+ **** R in Kepler |
+ **** ROADNet Realtime (Revelle ship) |
+ **** Kepler This Year: |
+ ***** User Interface ... need a full eval and reworking of all UI for our target group |
+ ****** Semantic annotation interface / ontology browsing interfaces |
+ ***** Distributed computing / grid computing |
+ ****** large jobs; lots of machines; detaiched execution |
+ ***** "Smart" data discovery (as for actors) |
+ ****** support for data sources that are distributed |
+ ***** Actor repository / downloadable actors |
+ ***** Integration and transformation using semantics |
+ ****** generate required transformation for: data-actor integration; actor-actor integration |
+ ****** handle "semantics" for R scripts, etc. |
+ ******* file based buffering reduces our ability to reason about the data flow |
+ ******* SMB: ''not exactly sure where the precise problem is here ...'' |
+ ****** Finish EcoGrid Access |
+ ******* full EML support |
+ ******* support for "large" data and 3rd party transfer |
+ ******* more data sources and types of data sources (e.g., JDBC, GEON data) |
+ ****** Provenance and metadata propagation |
+ *** Shawn Bowers (me) |
+ *** Jessie Kennedy |
+ **** SEEK Taxon Scenario |
+ **** Goal is to develop the taxon name server |
+ **** High-level approach |
+ ***** extract information from taxonomic concept providers; and convert to taxonomy transfer schema (TML) |
+ ***** "Semantic Mediation System" used to do concept matching/expansion/weighted concepts; leveraged from EML |
+ ***** Most focus on Taxonomy Transfer schema |
+ **** Names versus concepts problems |
+ ***** use concepts instead of names .... decouple concepts from names |
+ ***** taxon name: label/word/string |
+ ****** used for communicating ideas about organisms or groups of organisms ... meaningless without a definition, but it is used as if it has a clear meaning |
+ ****** full scientific name: sci name + author abbreviation [+date] |
+ ******* implies a concept: as intended and documented by the original author of then ame |
+ ****** vernacular name: scrub history |
+ ***** What is a concept? |
+ ****** taxon concept: unique name plus definition |
+ ******* full sci. name + "according to" (author + date) |
+ ****** Taxon goals |
+ ******* define use case; acceess current taxon working practice; design schema for object server; implement prototype; eval globally unique ids and their applicability |
+ ****** investigate interface between SMS and taxon group |
+ ****** end user tools |
+ ***** progress: |
+ ****** use cases finished, but still under review |
+ ****** taxon working practice: developed a langauge definition, etc ... |
+ ***** version 1.01 ... aimee and robert will demo |
+ ***** globally unique ids: UUIDs, handle system, DOIs, LSIDs |
+ ***** prototype ... |
+ ***** interface with sms: session during the week to discuss |
+ ***** case study, anticipating north american mammals example |
+ *** Deana Pennington |
+ **** Original goals |
+ ***** case studies in ecology and biodiversity |
+ ***** assemble a framework that interconnects ... |
+ **** First project: eco niche modeling |
+ ***** mammal project |
+ ***** 2-3 dispersal scenarios; 2 major evolutionary-computing algorithms (GA and NN); 21 GCM scenarios, including all IPCC scenarios |
+ **** eco niche modeling |
+ **** 2nd beam project, focusing on biodiversity |
+ ***** use biodiversity and productivity field data |
+ ***** link with enm project |
+ ***** use biodiversity indices |
+ ***** expand group of scientists |
+ **** nceas group: Waid, Scheiner, Willig, Cox, Chalcraft; biodiv/productivity scaling rels in semi-arid grasses |
+ **** pdtnet group: Suding, Weiher, Collins, Cleland, Clark; biodiv/productivity functional rels in semi-arid grasses |
+ **** ENM/biodiv integrated analysis |
+ ***** remotely sensed imagery -> from Jim Quinn at Davis |
+ *** Samantha Romanello |
+ **** EOT |
+ ***** Current activities: on-site trainings; conf. workshops and related activities; new website |
+ ***** future activities: on-line modules; distributed graduate seminar |
+ **** on-site trainings |
+ **** new fac. and postdoc workshop |
+ ***** how to incorporate into their teaching |
+ ***** results of the workshop from last january |
+ *** Raja |
+ **** GOAL: EcoGrid as a standardized interface (using web and grid services) |
+ **** Grid-standardized interfaces: uniform interface to metacat, srb, digir, xanthoria; anyone can implement these interfaces; hides complexity of underlying systems |
+ **** metadata-mediated data access |
+ ***** supports multiple metadata standard, EML, Darwin Core as foci |
+ ***** computational services: pre-defined analytical services; on-the-fly analytical services |
+ **** all based on gwsdl service |
+ **** metacat and srb services implemented |
+ **** metadata: EML and darwin core |
+ **** authentication |
+ **** query sevice level 1: get/query services; web-based available |
+ **** registry services: implemented in 2 phases -- reimplemented -- list of avail services on web |
+ **** Next steps: |
+ ***** design and impl. other ecogrid services |
+ ***** extend existing services |
+ ***** more ams integration - kepler |
+ ***** more sms integration - growl (?) |
+ ***** add new services: onto servers, taxon servers, LSID server |
+ ***** user interface development |
+ ***** documentation and training |
+ ***** enable more apps and data ingestions |
+ ***** increase user collaborations |
+ *** Laura Downey |
+ **** usability |
+ ***** "the extent to which a product can be used by specified users to achieve specified goals with effictiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction in a specified context of users" |
+ ***** "an approach that incorporates direct user feedback througout the development cycle to reduce costs and create products and tools that meet user needs." |
+ **** benefits o fusability: increased productivity, sales and revenues, customer satisfaction; decrease traning and support costs, etc. |
+ **** real world example: after move.com completed the redesign of two problem features, users ability to find a home increases from 62 to 98 percent, sales lead generation to real estate agents increased 150%. |
+ **** user interface + functionality = usability |
+ ***** elegant or sophisticated internal algorithms don't make any diff inf the interface is bad ... |
+ **** software versus usability engineering: ui code 30 percent, now almost 50-60; maintainence, etc. |
+ ***** typical software program is released with 40 usability design problems; over 70% of CIO's state on of biggest problems is communicating with users |
+ **** incorporate usability in seek |
+ ***** collect demographic data |
+ ***** task analysis (interviews and observations) |
+ ***** apply good human factors and design principles |
+ ***** iterative design |
+ ***** gather user feedback and input: ind. interviews; group discussions; usability evals and testing; categorization exercises; self-reporting; satisfaction surveys |
+ **** general design principles |
+ ***** use minimalist approach but provide details on demand |
+ ***** apply consisten visual and information design (readability, coding, color, icons, metaphors, data organization) |
+ ***** apply appropriate interaction design (tasks, and user's understanding) |
+ ***** minimize memory and attention load (memory and processing information limitations) [http://www.laoairlines.com] |
+ ***** speak users' language (user terminology not geek-speak) |
+ **** providing flexibility (shortcuts, RCMs, wizards); provide status and feedback; provide meaningful error and feedback messages |
+ **** upcoming usability activities |
+ ***** seek annual meeting: general usability discussion |
+ ***** kepler - december: needs dicsussion, observation during training, group executioin of two simple scenarios |
+ ***** esa data registry -- february: individual or group usabilitiy testing on registering data |
+ ***** issues or ideas on the usability of SEEK tools then contact me: Laura L. Downey |
+ |
Line 6 was replaced by line 169 |
- ! November 3, 2004 |
+ ! Wednesday, Nov. 3, 2004 |
Line 8 was replaced by line 171 |
- ! November 4, 2004 |
+ ! Thursday, Nov. 4, 2004 |
Line 10 was replaced by line 173 |
- ! NOvember 5, 2004 |
+ ! Friday, Nov. 5, 2004 |