Science Environment for Ecological Knowledge
Ecoinformatics site parent site of Partnership for Biodiversity Informatics site parent site of SEEK - Home
Science Environment for Ecological Knowledge









 

 

 



SMS Breakout Nov 2004

Difference between version 42 and version 27:

Line 19 was replaced by line 19
- * Bertram high-level
+ * Bertram (overview)
At line 54 added 62 lines.
+ ** Measurement, parasitism ontology (from SWDB'04 paper)
+ *** [Presentation|http://cvs.ecoinformatics.org/cvs/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/seek/projects/kr-sms/presentations/bowers_beam_sept_04.ppt]
+ *** observation, TaxonID, Parasite, Host
+ *** Example: annotating d1 ...
+ ----
+ d1(Ge,Sp,Co,Lt,Ln) ~ \\
+ Observation(O), value(O,Co), context(O,S), location(S,P), LatLonPoint(P),
+ latDeg(P,Lt), lonDeg(P,Ln), item(O,A), Abundance(A), property(A,N), SciName(N),
+ genus(N,Ge), species(N,Se).
+ ----
+ *** Who is creating these mappings?
+ *** Shawn: use of a tool
+
+ * Discussion about interface ...
+ ** Can we use growl browser to do the semantic annotation mappings graphically
+ *** similar in style to xml mapping tools
+ *** what is missing:
+ **** multiple selection of nodes
+ **** difficult to get relevant stuff when you expand nodes ... many nodes you don't care about up the inheritence tree
+ **** just want subclass and derived properties
+ **** graph query language ... to filter ... decouple what you show and select
+ ***** e.g., i am only interested in isa links, so you might want to have a power user language, to subset what you are currently showing
+ ***** would generalize; think it would be a useful extension to these visual editors, ... "+ isa; - any"
+ ***** expression language for power use to turn on and off certain things; incremental search that start from results
+ **** graphic frame logic
+ ***** a fundamental problem with visualization formulas as opposed to logical _consequent_ of the formulas
+
+ * Jessie: ProFormaVis -- based on Angiosperm ontology
+ ** structures, attributes-values
+ ** reads in ontology; divides the gui into structure hierarchy, selected structure description details
+ ** the ontology doesn't try to define what a plant is, but gives the set of things you might want to say about plants
+ ** trying to describe a specimen, e.g., leaf, with attribute veination pattern, and anastomosing and arcuate...
+ *** the veination patther is anastomosing and arcuate
+ ** the end to end application: the scientist refines the set of things and properties (attribute values) that are useful for a collection; a form is generated / configured based on those filters; for others to classify items to
+ ** Bob Morris, et al., allows general description of things -- Structure of Descriptive Data -- TADWIG
+ ** Commercial program called Lucid 3
+
+ * Nico on Taxon / SMS
+ ** partial overlaps
+ ** give me the ants of south america ... give all concepts of ants (may be thousands) ...
+ ** Deana: in biodiversity use case; want to group by function, which is similar to form
+ *** Several international ones that are comprehensive in traits and functions
+ *** Weren't sure the relevance to north america plants
+ *** in KNB now, can do exactly the same search (via ITIS) ... through markup via EML
+ ** rich: given two identifiers how are they similar
+
+ * follow-up list
+ ** growl extension selective viewing / filtered views based on some keywords / or in general queries / or just let user select nodes in the neighborhoods in the tree
+ ** schema mapping language ... what is taxon doing versus what is sms doing (for annotations) and how can each be informed by each other
+ *** for taxon, mapping into exchange schema ... trying to determine how concepts are represented within a database
+ *** for sms, mapping into ontology
+ ** more examples for annotation
+ *** deana possible small kr/sms working group to identify useful items to annotation (workflow and data) and map to Rich's ontologies
+ ** interface for annotation ... filtering Rich's ontology ... to form-style interface for annotation (Laura, Jessie, and Deana)
+ ** graph-based ontology queries for filtering and selecting ontology (Serguei, GrOWL)
+ ** SMS/Taxon link-up points
+ *** compare mapping languages
+ *** data discovery queries w/ taxon
+ *** similarity between ids
+ *** operations that sms needs ... taxon ops that sms needs
+ *** how does sms know when to call a taxon service? e.g., via which concepts in the rich's ontology?
+ ** sparrow to owl; owl to sparrow
At line 55 added 1 line.
+ * Next steps (...)

Back to SMS Breakout Nov 2004, or to the Page History.