|
Difference between
version 30
and
version 29:
| Lines 56-58 were replaced by lines 56-58 |
| - ** GBIF GUID meeting in Feb 1-3 [Jessie, Bob, others?] |
| - *** Jan 30-31 Taxon submeeting Durham or Chapel Hill? Bob will check on meeting at NESCent. Discuss GUID positions [Note: NESCent agreed to host the meeting.] |
| - *** Jessie asked whether SEEK-Taxon should develop a position as to a preferred outcome for the GUID meeting. Bob greed this would be desirable. [This will be taken up during the conference call in early January.] |
| + ** GBIF GUID meeting in Feb 1-3 (Jessie, Bob, others?) |
| + *** Jan 30-31 Taxon submeeting Durham or Chapel Hill? Bob will check on meeting at NESCent. Discuss GUID positions (Note: NESCent subsequently agreed to host the meeting.) |
| + *** Jessie asked whether SEEK-Taxon should develop a position as to a preferred outcome for the GUID meeting. Bob agreed that this would be desirable. (IN subsequent emails it was agreed that this will be taken up during the conference call on January 5.) |
| Line 73 was replaced by line 73 |
| - ** will get rest of Alan Weakley's data [Note: Bob has the spreadhseet with 44,251 relationships. However, he has discovered that the mapping applies only to the tips of the phylogenetic tree. COnsequently, if Fernald recognized varieties and Weakley did not, then there is no mapping of species-to-species relationships. Bob will work with Xianhua in an effort to develop an algorithm to automatically fill in the missing relationships.] |
| + ** will get rest of Alan Weakley's data. (Note: Bob has the spreadsheet with 44,251 relationships. However, he has discovered that the mapping applies only to the tips of the phylogenetic tree. Consequently, if Fernald recognized varieties and Weakley did not, then there is no mapping of species-to-species relationships. Bob will work with Xianhua in an effort to develop an algorithm to automatically fill in the missing relationships.) |
Back to Taxon WG Conference Call_22 Nov 2005,
or to the Page History.
|
