|
Difference between
version 47
and
version 41:
| Line 6 was replaced by line 6 |
| - * [OWL file |KRMeetingJan06Summary#OWL file] |
| + * [OWL files |KRMeetingJan06Summary#OWL files] |
| Line 13 was replaced by line 13 |
| - The Knowledge Representation working group met for three days in San Antonio, TX with the aim of producing a core ontology for ecological observation. The proposed scope of the observation ontology for ecology (OBOE) was to capture the information/concepts needed to combine or determine the differences/similarities between two datasets. The proposed uses for such as ontology are consistency checking, data annotation and data integration. This scope and uses of OBOE will be elaborated in a formal document that will be appended __here__ in the near future. |
| + The Knowledge Representation working group met for three days in San Antonio, TX with the aim of producing a core ontology for ecological observation. The proposed scope of the observation ontology for ecology (OBOE) was to capture the information/concepts needed to combine or determine the differences/similarities between two datasets. The proposed uses for such as ontology are consistency checking, data annotation and data integration. This scope and uses of OBOE will be elaborated in a formal document that will be appended ''here'' in the near future. |
| Line 23 was replaced by line 23 |
| - The next step is to build use case scenarios which are being outlined [here|KRMeetingJan06Summary]. The final model also allows for modularization of domain specific concepts that can be termed observables. Therefore, domain models of observables can be plugged in to the observable class when annotating data. Such domain models include spatial and temporal concept ontologies and the ecological concepts ontology. The "units" ontology will be plugged into the measurement construct. We divided these tasks, which are outlined [here|KRMeetingJan06Summary#Tasks]. |
| + The next step is to build use case scenarios which are being outlined [here|SEEKObservationOntology]. The final model also allows for modularization of domain specific concepts that can be termed observables. Therefore, domain models of observables can be plugged in to the observable class when annotating data. Such domain models include spatial and temporal concept ontologies and the ecological concepts ontology. The "units" ontology will be plugged into the measurement construct. We divided these tasks, which are outlined [here|KRMeetingJan06Summary#Tasks]. |
| Lines 45-46 were replaced by lines 45-47 |
| - !!OWL file |
| - [draft|http://cvs.ecoinformatics.org/cvs/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/seek/projects/kr-sms/kr/ontologies/drafts/KRMeetingJan06/Observation.owl] |
| + !!OWL files |
| + * [draft OBOE|http://cvs.ecoinformatics.org/cvs/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/seek/projects/kr-sms/kr/ontologies/drafts/KRMeetingJan06/Observation.owl] |
| + * [draft OBOE/UNITS|http://cvs.ecoinformatics.org/cvs/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/seek/projects/kr-sms/kr/ontologies/drafts/KRMeetingJan06/Units.owl] |
| Line 95 was replaced by line 96 |
| - |
| + ---- |
| Line 98 was replaced by line 99 |
| - |
| + ---- |
| Line 101 was replaced by line 102 |
| - |
| + ---- |
Back to KR Meeting Jan 06 Summary,
or to the Page History.
|
