Science Environment for Ecological Knowledge
Ecoinformatics site parent site of Partnership for Biodiversity Informatics site parent site of SEEK - Home
Science Environment for Ecological Knowledge









 

 

 



Kepler Meeting SMS Notes

Difference between version 26 and version 25:

Line 106 was replaced by lines 106-115
- A very simple keyword-based search implementation within Kepler.
+ *** A very simple keyword-based search we (Chad and I) implemented within Kepler.
+ **** Integrated with the component 'quick search' frame
+ **** Allows dynamic actor classification (for browsing)
+ **** Allows runtime annotation and re-classification of actors
+ **** Term expansion for individual concept queries
+ *** Required a number of new features in Kepler:
+ ***# ID mechanism for actors
+ ***# Repositories
+ ***** Fakes out: component repository (as a ptolemy xml config file), annotation repository (xml file), ontology (simple is-a hierarchy, no rels, etc.)
+ ***# Provides a very naive local ID service (like for LSIDs). Hand-coded.
Removed lines 108-110
- Fakes out: workflow component LSIDs, an actor repository (as a
- ptolemy xml config file), annotation repository (xml file), LSID
- service.
Removed line 112
- The "ontology" is a simple hierarchy. No rels, etc.
At line 113 added 1 line.
+ __What's needed for KEPLER__
At line 114 added 3 lines.
+ * Ontologies and Ontology Tools
+ ** There basically aren't any.
+ ** There also aren't any tools in Kepler for creating, browsing, or editing ontologies.
Line 116 was replaced by lines 125-129
- * What's Needed for KEPLER
+ * Annotations
+ ** Need to extend the annotation "language"
+ ** Desperately need an annotation editor/browser
+ *** Need a reasonable/practical GUI design
+ *** Need a good way to access/browse a component/dataset and its attributes, such as is ports and their input/output types.
Removed line 118
- ** Ontologies
Line 120 was replaced by lines 132-135
- There basically aren't any.
+ * Basic Kepler GUI Hooks
+ ** Like for toolbar, menus, etc.
+ ** Checking semantic compatibility (can steal unit resolver?).
+ ** Explanation of results (like for searching, etc.)
Removed lines 122-137
- There also aren't any tools. No tools within Kepler.
-
-
- ** Repositories ...
-
- The Obj. Mngr. can help! We don't have repositories for
- workflows/components, ontologies, annotations, or datasets in
- KEPLER.
-
- For annotations, need a searchable "index" of annotations and ids
- (for components, datasets, etc.), and a mechanism to "retrieve"
- those items.
-
- For performance, I wonder though if the "index" should be in
- memory.
-
Lines 139-151 were replaced by lines 138-152
- ** Semantic Annotation Editor
-
- This doesn't exist either ... lots of ways/approaches here.
-
- Need GUI design for this.
-
- Also, need a good way to access/browse a component/dataset and its
- attributes, such as is ports and their input/output types.
-
- Similar with datasets
-
- The challenges are making this tool easy to use, and accessible
- within Kepler.
+ * Algorithms
+ ** Need to understand the integration/merging algorithms
+ ** Could today write the other types of search algorithms
+
+ * Repositories
+ ** Basically none of the repositories exist (except perhaps for Data, not sure)
+ ** I think the Kepler Obj. Manager can help with this, what we need from it is:
+ *** Ability to register components, data sets, ontologies, and annotations with the obj. manager
+ *** Ability to access all LSIDs of a certain type, e.g., components, data sets, ontologies, annotations
+ *** Ability to retrieve the object for an LSID
+ *** Some form of ''annotation indexing'' (this is similar to metadata indexing perhaps)
+ **** A search can be executed directly against an in-memory annotation file (e.g., obtained dynamically from all registered objects)
+ **** In contrast to asking the obj mngr for all lsids that are annotations, and for each retrieving the annotation file, etc.
+ *** For efficiency, probably want multiple access paths via lsids, e.g., get all the workflow components and for each, retrieve it's annotation (if there are a lot more annotations than just for components); or build an annotation index based on these lsids, etc.
+ **** What types of indexing exactly needing should be driven by development/testing, but we may consider an obj. mngr. architecture that can easily support "extensible" indexing strategies (e.g., through listeners, etc.)
Removed line 154
- ** Basic Kepler Interfaces / GUI Design
Removed lines 156-157
- Like for searching, checking semantic compatibility (can steal
- unit resolver), explanation of semantics (like for searching, etc.)

Back to Kepler Meeting SMS Notes, or to the Page History.