|
Difference between
version 11
and
version 10:
| Line 15 was replaced by line 15 |
| - *consider mechanism for communicating both composite form and its function (kind of composite) |
| + *consider mechanism for communicating both composite form and its function (kind of composite) (Laura will work with the graphic designer to produce design) |
| Line 17 was replaced by line 17 |
| - *need to define small set of types of computations |
| + *_need to define small set of types of computations (Need feedback from the team on this!)_ |
| Line 19 was replaced by line 19 |
| - *consider defining small set of atomic actors that go across ontologies and small set of icons for ecology domain -- LLD> issue here would still be that some kind of functions might be represented differently across ontologies) |
| + *consider defining small set of atomic actors that go across ontologies and small set of icons for ecology domain -- LLD> issue here would still be that some kind of functions might be represented differently across ontologies |
| Line 23 was replaced by line 23 |
| - All feedback is welcome and encouraged, but what I need most here are suggestions for expanding computation category to cover several top level types of computation such as integrals, summations etc. We will definitely add an "R" represention which will just be an R. I would also like to add "statistics" as a high level category. |
| + All feedback is welcome and encouraged, but what I need most here are suggestions for expanding the computation category to cover several top level types of computation such as integrals, summations etc. We will definitely add an "R" represention which will just be an R. I would also like to add "statistics" as a high level category. |
Back to Kepler Symbology,
or to the Page History.
|
