|
|||
|
This is version 31.
It is not the current version, and thus it cannot be edited. 1 Introduction
2 The Eco-Ontology CoreThis section describes the fundamental building blocks of the eco-ontology -- called the eco-ontology core (or just "the core"). The core is represented as a single package, and all other ontologies defined within (or that extend) the eco-ontology are built from the core. The purpose of the core is to establish the set of basic semantic constructs that can be used to define more complex ecological concepts and relationships.
ThingsEvery concept in the eco-ontology extends the concept EcoOntThing. The name "thing" is often used informally in ontologies to denote the set of all things. Instead of "thing", we use the term object, but we retain the convention of using the term "thing" to name the most general concept. Every object in the eco-ontology is thus considered an ecological ontology "thing". Figure 1 below shows the definition of EcoOntThing. As shown, objects can be named using the hasName attribute. Object names are optional (denoted by the '0' in the cardinality restriction '0..*'), and an object may have more than one name (denoted by the '*' in the cardinality restriction '0..*').
Parts and WholesObjects are often described in terms of their structural relationships. One of the most basic structural relationships is the connection between parts and wholes. These part-whole relationships treat one object as the "composite", containing zero or more other objects serving as the "parts". Figure 2 shows the basic constructs used in the core for representing parts and wholes. The concepts Composite and Part are defined as sub-concepts of EcoOntThing. And composites and parts are related through the hasPart and partOf relationships, respectively.
As shown, the hasPart relationship relates a composite object to zero or more parts. Similarly, the partOf relationship relates a part object to its associated composite object. A part object can participate in zero or more composite objects (that is, a part can be shared between containers). The part-whole relationship of Figure 2 is defined to be transitive. If a container c contains a part p1, and part p1 is also a container containing a part p2, then c is said to also contain p2 by virtue of transitivity. We can represent this more formally by saying that if hasPart(c, p1) and hasPart(p1, p2) is true, then hasPart(c, p2) is also true. The inverse also holds, that is, if partOf(p2, p1) and partOf(p1, c) is true, then partOf(p2, c) is also true. There are five distinct ways that part-whole relationships can be specialized within the core, shown in Figures 3 - 7. The first specialization, shown in Figure 3, describes composites that contain at least one part. As shown, all NonEmptyComposite objects are connected to at least one part object.
The second specialization, shown in Figure 4, describes the concept of inserperable parts. As shown, all InserperablePart objects are contained within at least one composite object, that is, the object will not exist separately from a collection.
The third specialization, shown in Figure 5, describes the notion of an essential part. A composite object in general can contain heterogeneous parts, for example, a car is made up of wheels, a chassis, bumpers, and so on. An essential part denotes a specific type of part that all objects of a particular type of collection must posses. Wheels are generally considered an essential part of a car, whereas a sunroof is not an essential part.
The fourth specialization, shown in Figure 6, describes unique parts. A collection object will have at most one unique part object, if a unique part is defined for the collection. A chassis is a unqiue part for a car, that is, any one car can have at most one chassis. Note that a chassis is also an essential part for a car. We permit part-whole specializations to be freely mixed.
The last specialization, shown in Figure 7, defines unshareable parts. An unshareable part object can be a part of at most one collection at a time.
http://cvs.ecoinformatics.org/cvs/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/seek/projects/kr-sms/docs/OntoManual/core6.png]
Observations and Measurements
The following figure shows the basic definition of an observation, where itemMeasured is a restricted partOf relationship.
|
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under award 0225676. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recomendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation (NSF). Copyright 2004 Partnership for Biodiversity Informatics, University of New Mexico, The Regents of the University of California, and University of Kansas |