|
|||
|
This is version 3.
It is not the current version, and thus it cannot be edited. KR SMS AHM Agenda Topics and Notes, 2007
Wed, Dec 13, 2007, Breakout
OBOE extensions / other ontologiescurrent status & open issues (Josh): - LTER Controlled Vocab - Collaborative (web-based) approach for extensions (e.g., Thinkcap) - What would the interface be - Complexity versus simplicity - Browsing/viewing ontologies - How to store/manage the ontologies - Additional Metadata - Reuse(cycle) existing ontologies (e.g., Rich Williams', existing ontologies?) tasks: - finish up three different extension approaches - document and publish extensions - figure out additional extensions needed 3 Applications current status: - semantic annotation interchange language - the oboe-web prototype - kepler tools open issues: - interface design for oboe annotations - where should the oboe applications/demos live? (Kepler, Morhpo, Web, ...) - connecting up eml (metacat/morpho/kepler) and oboe - ontologies for annotating actor ports and annotation interface design (e.g., ontos based on oboe, simpe types?) - how should we extend the kepler tools, e.g., adding ontologies, using port annotations in search - overall KR/SMS architecture tasks: - concrete demos showing advantages of KR/SMS - what tools do we want to work on in the next year - implementation plan (who will work on what ...)
|
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under award 0225676. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recomendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation (NSF). Copyright 2004 Partnership for Biodiversity Informatics, University of New Mexico, The Regents of the University of California, and University of Kansas |