Kr Sms Taxon 2005 Mar 8

This is version 2. It is not the current version, and thus it cannot be edited.
[Back to current version]   [Restore this version]

Breakout Session for KR/SMS/Taxon 2005 March 8

Participants: Aimee, Bertram, Shawn, Dan, Mark

Possible collaboration point: reasoning over functional attribute database

Semantic mediator will call TOS

EML

• Maintain GUIDs in metadata or resolve dynamically
• Could bind resolution if done by original data collector/author
• Third party resolution results could improve over time until TOS cache is somewhat stable.
• Who is responsible for the association if not maintained in EML?

Use Case:

• Scientist brings in 2 datasets
• Resolve names for each list
• Can this data be integrated? yes/no
• Need Integrate function: integrate(list1, list2, resolutionLevel). (This is already on the task list for Taxon)

For a more automated workflow approach - maybe associate taxonType as output port for dataset actor and input port for analysis actor

Additional input for findConcepts:

• ancillary data to help resolve concept (i.e. geographic, functional, temporal data about dataset)
• level of desired resolution (could be part of algorithm)

Additional functionality needed from TOS:

• Resolve a list of names to a rescaled list of concepts
• step 1: names to concepts (with user interaction?)
• how is this determined when taxonomists make judgements based on taxonomic author/provider?
• step 2: concept to parent
• third party relationships or originally defined concept relationships
• Compatible(concept1, concept2, criteria) - someone needs to define criteria for analysis.
• List of names: are these most recent/best names; what are ambiguities, and need for human intervention to resolve; which GUID associated for co-referencing with other data.
• Within a list of names where entries have differing resolutions, want to (automatically) rescale these requiring lumping to reconcile