|
|||
|
This is version 2.
It is not the current version, and thus it cannot be edited. October 22-26, 2003
|
Oct 22 | EcoGrid | |
7:30 am | Continental breakfast | |
8:30 am | Welcome, introductions, brief overview | Jones |
9:30am - 3:00 pm | EcoGrid breakout A -- Develop list of data sources for niche modeling task -- Include traditional and non-traditional sources (e.g., ecology survey data transformed to be occurrence data) -- Identify locations of the data sources now, and where they can/should be stored and accessed from EcoGrid, who needs to be contacted to get the right data -- Possibly enter metadata/data as appropriate into metacat/srb for later retrieval | |
9:30 am | EcoGrid breakout B EcoGrid API status and implementation issues | |
10:30 am | Break | |
10:45 am | Registry and discovery | |
12:00 pm | Lunch | |
1:15 pm | Authentication, Authorization, and CAs | |
3:00 pm | Breakout report | |
3:30 pm | Revise tasks and milestones, plan release schedule | |
4:00 pm | adjourn to make it to the ERE reception at NCEAS at 4:30 pm to 6:00 pm |
Oct 23 | KR/SMS | |
8:00 am | Continental breakfast | |
8:45 am | Welcome | Ludaescher, Schildhauer |
9:00 am | What is metadata and what is KR? -- connections between EML and ontologies | Schildhauer |
9:45 am | Low Level KR/SMS issues: Typing data sets and pipelines for access via EcoGrid, and usage within AMS | Bowers |
10:30 am | BREAK | |
10:45 am | Practical KR: Prototype ontologies for Scientific Measurement and Ecological Networks | Williams |
11:30 am | Discussion | |
12:00 pm - 1:15pm | LUNCH BREAK | |
1:15 pm | EcoGrid dependencies and needs from EML/KR/SMS | Jones |
2:00 pm | Breakout A: discussion of KR/SMS API for the EcoGrid Breakout B: how to extend EML or otherwise bridge KR/SMS with EML | |
3:30 pm | BREAK | |
3:45 pm | Breakout report and discussion; milestones, deliverables, and task assignments | |
5:00 pm | adjourn |
Oct 24 | AMS | |
7:30 am | Continental breakfast | |
8:30 am | AMS development overview and discussion | |
9:15 - 5:30 | AMS breakout A -- Review, create/revise PTII niche modeling workflows *using PTII* -- Prioritize actor implementation tasks -- Develop classification of analyses + models for Grid service discovery | |
9:15 am | AMS breakout B Types in PTII: records, nulls, TypeLattice, and EML data ingestion | |
10:30 am | Break | |
10:45 am | Semantic types: utilization in PTII and MoML integration (MoML vs WSDL) | |
11:45 am | Alternative workflow approaches (UML, BPEL) | Sundermier |
12:00 pm | Lunch | |
1:15 pm | Grid services: finding + getting data from EcoGrid in Ptolemy | |
3:00 pm | Break | |
3:15 pm | Grid service discovery in PTII + classifying analytical services | |
4:00 pm | Grid service execution in PTII for computation: dynamic ports Workflow planning + optimized execution of Grid services | |
5:30 pm | adjourn |
Oct 25 | KR/SMS | |
7:30 am | Continental breakfast | |
8:30 am | Integrated/Object Modelling (IOM) vs KR/SMS | Krivov, Villa |
9:15 am | AMS dependencies on SMS: experiences and recommendations from SciDAC | Ludaescher |
9:45 am | Discussion --IOM and AMS relative to KR/SMS | |
10:30 am | BREAK | |
10:45 am | Requirements for ontology registries: how do we store, access, and share our efforts-- formalisms and frameworks | |
12:00- 1:15pm | LUNCH BREAK | |
1:15 pm | task for breakout sessions | |
1:30 pm | Breakout A: BEAM needs from KR/SMS -- tools and approaches for domain experts, granularity needs for assuring reusability, review existing ontologies and their utility Breakout B: details of ontology repositories on the EcoGrid, semantic data registration, inter-ontology linkages, existing sources (thesauri, MORIS, GCMD, etc.) | |
3:30 pm | BREAK | |
3:45 pm | Breakout report and discussion; milestones, deliverables, and task assignments. | |
5:00 pm | adjourn |
Go to top
More info...
Attach file...
|
This particular version was published on 25-May-2004 13:45:17 PDT by stekell. |
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under award 0225676. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recomendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation (NSF). Copyright 2004 Partnership for Biodiversity Informatics, University of New Mexico, The Regents of the University of California, and University of Kansas |