Science Environment for Ecological Knowledge
Ecoinformatics site parent site of Partnership for Biodiversity Informatics site parent site of SEEK - Home
Science Environment for Ecological Knowledge








 

 

 

All Hands Meeting 2005
Your trail: InformaticsTrainingForLTERAndOBFSOctober16272006 | DocWriting | ENMwkflow | KRMeetingJuly06 | SiteReviewJune2006 | ProjectMeetingMay2006 | TaxonMeeting_30Jan2006 | KRMeetingJan06 | SEEKPostdoctoralAndNewFacultyTrainingJanuary9132006 | InformaticsTrainingForLTERAndOBFSOctober31November112005

Difference between version 58 and version 57:

Removed lines 52-54
- *** Any remaining sub-project updates
- **** Xianhua, Concept Mapping and authoring tool: review of prototype, next steps.
- **** Martin, Collections visualization tool: review of prototype, next steps
At line 55 added 4 lines.
+ *** Xianhua, Concept Mapping and authoring tool: review of prototype, next steps.
+ *** Martin, Collections visualization tool: review of prototype, next steps
+ ***
+
At line 64 added 1 line.
+
Line 66 was replaced by lines 68-79
- *** Kepler complete work flow discussion including Higgins, Pennington, integration of DiGIR and SMS in use case work flow
+
+ *** Uber-discussion: next two year vision, deliverables, roadmap, engineering dependencies, end-user tasks to be supported, data acquisition for the prototypes, decomposing Kepler engineering steps to accomplish usage scenarios. How do all the SEEK-Taxon components fit together now?
+
+ *** Kepler-Taxon work flow discussion including Higgins, Pennington, integration of DiGIR and SMS in use case work flow, responsibilities, where is the user interaction? TOS Actor-how would it be used in workflows? What are the usage scenarios for TOS within Kepler? How else might the TOS be embedded in Kepler?
+
+ *** Broader TDWG and community issues for TCS and TOS. What are their expectations? Our responsibilities? Can SEEK demonstrate the utility of TCS and TOS within the next year? What tools do we need to complete and harden for the community to buy into TCS and TOS? What can we expect from the GBIF community? Short term versus ultimate objectives.
+
+ *** Concept merging tool, and how to identify concepts that match user's query concept 'expectation', (e.g. query TOS, return concepts to Kepler, do a EcoGrid query). How to build a UI that is meaningful to users for such tasks.
+
+
+
+
At line 67 added 1 line.
+
At line 73 added 3 lines.
+ *** Usability thread: which users to which evaluations, next steps, roadmap(Laura)
+ *** Data acquisition roadblocks, process, role of software tools, getting data into TOS with an import tool for usability testers
+
Removed line 75
- *** Usability thread:(Laura)
At line 77 added 6 lines.
+
+
+
+
+
+

Back to All Hands Meeting 2005, or to the Page History.


This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under award 0225676. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recomendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation (NSF).

LTER Logo
Long Term Ecological Research Network, UNM National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, UCSB Biodiversity Research Center, KU San Diego Supercomputer Center, UCSD
 
Arizona State University Napier University University of North Carolina University of Vermont
 
UC Davis Genome Center

Copyright 2004 Partnership for Biodiversity Informatics, University of New Mexico, The Regents of the University of California, and University of Kansas