Science Environment for Ecological Knowledge
Ecoinformatics site parent site of Partnership for Biodiversity Informatics site parent site of SEEK - Home
Science Environment for Ecological Knowledge








 

 

 

All Hands Meeting 2005
Your trail: InformaticsTrainingForLTERAndOBFSOctober16272006 | DocWriting | ENMwkflow | KRMeetingJuly06 | SiteReviewJune2006 | ProjectMeetingMay2006 | TaxonMeeting_30Jan2006 | KRMeetingJan06 | SEEKPostdoctoralAndNewFacultyTrainingJanuary9132006 | InformaticsTrainingForLTERAndOBFSOctober31November112005

Difference between version 70 and version 69:

Line 132 was replaced by line 132
- **** Update: 1600 PDF documents obtained, 100 are bat taxonomy papers, extracting data next
+ **** Currently: 1600 PDF documents obtained, 100 are bat taxonomy papers, extracting data next
Line 137 was replaced by line 137
- **** Have: ITIS (nominal+ concepts), Bats from MSW 2005 (MSW concepts from original pubs, and synonyms without bib references), MSW 1993, FNA in TCS, German Mosses (concepts with maps),
+ **** Currently: ITIS ("relational" concepts), Bats from MSW 2005 (MSW concepts from original pubs and synonyms without bib references), MSW 1993, FNA in TCS, German Mosses (concepts with concept maps),
At line 138 added 1 line.
+ **** Requirements: TOS Actor could be tested with plant data,
At line 139 added 1 line.
+ **** Possible: Use Bob Peet's plant concept data (44,000 with relationships?)with PLANTS county level distribution data as a supplement to bat use case scenario, Ranunculus data set, 8 classifications, NA & Mexico.
At line 140 added 1 line.
+ **** Action: Stinger Guala to identify in 2 weeks the number of versions of PLANTS, send to KU to DiGIRize, Bob will send rich treatement of plant concepts the US Southeast. Available now: Ranunculus data, it needs to be upgraded to latest TCS, Xianhua will do that in 1 week. Jan or Feb: All USDA Plants in version 4, mapped against all plants in FNA, and also all of the Alan Weekly collaboration, his version mapped against 8 different classifications of plants.
At line 141 added 1 line.
+ *** Broader TDWG and community issues for TCS and TOS. What are their expectations? Our responsibilities? Can SEEK demonstrate the utility of TCS and TOS within the next year? What tools do we need to complete and harden for the community to buy into TCS and TOS? What can we expect from the GBIF community? Short term versus ultimate objectives
At line 144 added 4 lines.
+
+
+
+
Line 147 was replaced by lines 155-161
- *** Broader TDWG and community issues for TCS and TOS. What are their expectations? Our responsibilities? Can SEEK demonstrate the utility of TCS and TOS within the next year? What tools do we need to complete and harden for the community to buy into TCS and TOS? What can we expect from the GBIF community? Short term versus ultimate objectives.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ .

Back to All Hands Meeting 2005, or to the Page History.


This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under award 0225676. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recomendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation (NSF).

LTER Logo
Long Term Ecological Research Network, UNM National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, UCSB Biodiversity Research Center, KU San Diego Supercomputer Center, UCSD
 
Arizona State University Napier University University of North Carolina University of Vermont
 
UC Davis Genome Center

Copyright 2004 Partnership for Biodiversity Informatics, University of New Mexico, The Regents of the University of California, and University of Kansas