Line 3 was replaced by line 3 |
- *Establish an point person at each university for infrastructure (i.e., getting course number,advertising course, etc.) |
+ *Establish a point person at each university for infrastructure (i.e., getting course number,advertising course, etc.) |
Lines 9-20 were replaced by lines 9-21 |
- *Proposed institutions include UC Davis, UCSB, KU and UNM. |
- *Current point people |
- **Bertram and Shawn, UC Davis |
- **Mark Schildhauer, UC SB |
- **Samantha Romanello and Deana Pennington, UNM |
- **James Beach?!?!, KU |
- *due to scheduling UNM/KU and UCSB/Davis |
- !Class format was discussed. |
- *Parrallel seminars that are coordinated enough to meet and overlap |
- *Shared curriculum |
- *Classes should be both computer science classes and ecology classes |
- *Each class could answer a regional biological/ecological question; data needed about 4 to 5 datasets which could then be used to synthesized across regions to answer the same biological/ecological question at a national scale |
+ Proposed institutions include UC Davis, UCSB, KU and UNM. |
+ Current point people |
+ *Bertram and Shawn, UC Davis |
+ *Mark Schildhauer, UC SB |
+ *Samantha Romanello and Deana Pennington, UNM |
+ *James Beach?!?!, KU |
+ due to scheduling issues link universities based on whether they run semesters:UNM/KU or quarters: UCSB/Davis. |
+ !Class format was discussed |
+ Parrallel seminars that are coordinated enough to meet and overlap; |
+ Shared curriculum; |
+ Classes should be both computer science classes and ecology classes; |
+ Each class could answer a regional biological/ecological question; |
+ |
Lines 22-32 were replaced by lines 23-38 |
- *Defining an interesting project from the ecology side that would also have an interesting enough computer science component. |
- *suggestions included |
- **Comparing and contrasting and knowledge representation of key ecological/biological issues --using the discussion |
- **Have students work on creating real application workflows |
- *Identifying individuals from both the computer science and biology/ecology side to assist in teaching the course -- |
- **Bertram/Shawn |
- **Town Peterson |
- **Alan hastings |
- *students should be able to get a publishable paper from class participation |
- *make sure the credit hours reflect the amount of outside class work |
- *Identify data that would be available – grassland biodiversity -- |
+ Defining an interesting project from the ecology side that would also have an interesting enough computer science component. Suggestions included: |
+ *Comparing and contrasting and knowledge representation of key ecological/biological issues--i.e., having students create nonformal ontologies on underlying concepts and comparing these ontologies to look at the relationship between diversity and productivity. |
+ *Have students work on creating real application workflows -- Creating conceptual models in kepler based on data and comparing those models –- |
+ *replicating the KNB working group study on biodiversity/productivity different measure of diversity |
+ *Sampling properties of different types of species-area curves and how they reflect underlying ecological processes. |
+ *Comparing and contrasting the two common experimental approaches used in understanding of biodiversity and productivity -- manipulations of productivity and the alternation of the number of species or functional groups. |
+ Identifying individuals from both the computer science and biology/ecology side to assist in teaching the course -- |
+ *Bertram/Shawn |
+ *Town Peterson |
+ *Alan Hastings |
+ *Susan Gauch |
+ *Stephen Cox |
+ Students should be able to get a publishable paper from class participation.\\ |
+ Make sure the credit hours reflect the amount of outside class work.\\ |
+ Identify data that would be available before class starts. \\ |
+ Question should be scalable across regions to answer the same biological/ecological question at a national scale. |