| Lines 3-24 were replaced by lines 3-23 |
| - *Members of the SEEK Exec proposed establishing a working group to design and implement the distributed graduate seminar. |
| - *The course should be held at 3-4 of the SEEK institutions. |
| - **Proposed institutions include UC Davis, UCSB, KU and UNM. |
| - **Current point people |
| - ***Bertram and Shawn, UC Davis |
| - ***Mark Schildhauer, UC SB |
| - ***Samantha Romanello and Deana Pennington, UNM |
| - ***James Beach?!?!, KU |
| - *Class format was discussed. |
| - **Parrallel seminars that are coordinated enough to meet and overlap and |
| - **Both computer science classes and ecology classes |
| - **Each class could answer a regional biological/ecological question; data needed about 4 to 5 datasets which could then be used to synthesized across regions to answer the same biological/ecological question at a national scale |
| - *KEY ISSUES |
| - **Defining an interesting project from the ecology side that would also have an interesting enough computer science component. |
| - *** suggestions included |
| - **** Comparing and contrasting and knowledge representation of key ecological/biological issues |
| - ****Have students work on creating real application workflows |
| - **Identifying individuals from both the computer science and biology/ecology side to assist in teaching the course |
| - **students should be able to get a publishable paper from class participation |
| - **make sure the credit hours reflect the amount of outside class work |
| - **Identify data that would be available – grassland biodiversity -- |
| - |
| + Members of the SEEK Exec proposed establishing a working group to design and implement the distributed graduate seminar. |
| + !The course should be held at 3-4 of the SEEK institutions. |
| + *Proposed institutions include UC Davis, UCSB, KU and UNM. |
| + *Current point people |
| + **Bertram and Shawn, UC Davis |
| + **Mark Schildhauer, UC SB |
| + **Samantha Romanello and Deana Pennington, UNM |
| + **James Beach?!?!, KU |
| + !Class format was discussed. |
| + *Parrallel seminars that are coordinated enough to meet and overlap and |
| + *Both computer science classes and ecology classes |
| + *Each class could answer a regional biological/ecological question; data needed about 4 to 5 datasets which could then be used to synthesized across regions to answer the same biological/ecological question at a national scale |
| + !KEY ISSUES |
| + *Defining an interesting project from the ecology side that would also have an interesting enough computer science component. |
| + *suggestions included |
| + **Comparing and contrasting and knowledge representation of key ecological/biological issues |
| + **Have students work on creating real application workflows |
| + *Identifying individuals from both the computer science and biology/ecology side to assist in teaching the course |
| + *students should be able to get a publishable paper from class participation |
| + *make sure the credit hours reflect the amount of outside class work |
| + *Identify data that would be available – grassland biodiversity -- |
