| Line 5 was replaced by line 5 |
| - !! Participants |
| + !!! Participants |
| Line 10 was replaced by line 10 |
| - * Bertram Ludaescher (ludaesch@sdsc.edu) |
| + * Bertram Ludaescher (ludaesch@ucdavis.edu) |
| Line 16 was replaced by line 16 |
| - * Manu Jiyal (manu.jayal@asu.edu) |
| + * Manu Jayal (manu.jayal@asu.edu) |
| Line 19 was replaced by line 19 |
| - * Else Cleland () |
| + * Else Cleland (elsac@stanford.edu) |
| At line 21 added 1 line. |
| + !!! Goals |
| Line 23 was replaced by lines 24-29 |
| - !! Agenda |
| + # __High-level ecological ontologies__: develop detailed ontologies for Biodiversity & Productivity-- in terms of relevant concepts and relationships from the very general theoretical level, and drilling all the way down to the operational level (algorithms and measurements used in quantifying biodiversity and productivity). |
| + # __Ontologies of data sets and analyses__: develop detailed ontologies of the data sets and analyses needed for some "past" Biodiversity/Productivity research, including clarifying the semantics and data transformations carried out to merge/integrate/summarize data, as well as "describing" the analytical components in ways that sufficiently expose their Inputs/Outputs and "functions" in ways that will facilitate discover and re-use of these components in alternative scientific workflows. |
| + # __Ontologies of ecological methodologies__: develop detailed ontologies that capture the essential features and differentiating nuances of the field and other methodologies employed in capturing the data to be dealt with in these investigations (overlaps with task 2 above). (We must __not__ lose sight of the need for "spatiotemporal ontologies", and the specific capabilities these will provide us with regards to 1-3 here) |
| + # __Scientific workflows__: develop detailed scientific workflows for some "past" Biodiversity/Productivity research, to formally capture at a fine grain the steps and operations, with sufficient semantic annotation to facilitate their transparency and reusability by other researchers. |
| + # __Taxonomic capabilities__: identify the specific types of services that "ecologists" might need on the select use case to improve the ability to deal with taxonomic names, especially in the context of historical, long-term and globally distributed biodiversity information |
| + # __Ecological research challenge__: conceive of a "Challenging" Biodiversity/Productivity analyses, which could be enabled via a scientific workflow managment (Kepler), and that demonstrates the power of accessing distributed data and computing resources, and would otherwise be highly inefficient or intractable to a "typical" individual researcher. |
| At line 24 added 4 lines. |
| + |
| + |
| + !!! Agenda |
| + |
| Line 61 was replaced by lines 71-135 |
| - !! Notes |
| + !!! Notes |
| + |
| + !! March 7th |
| + |
| + * Introduction, etc., Mark |
| + ** Went over the SEEK acronym soup |
| + ** Goals of the meeting / Agenda |
| + |
| + * Aimee on Taxon |
| + ** Now trying to get data into the system |
| + ** Presentation from TDWG (Taxonomic Database Working Group) |
| + *** solution |
| + **** connect data and ideas in dbs |
| + **** allow searches and retrievals |
| + **** be customizable by the user |
| + *** architecture |
| + *** allow alternative algorithms to weight matches |
| + *** allow taxonomists to: author new ideas, make new connections |
| + **** along with a pub., publish the new connections, etc. |
| + *** german moss data most comprehensive so far; 24000 concepts |
| + *** ITIS is shallow/incomplete concepts |
| + *** How to fit in with functional traits? |
| + **** Some dbs in Europe; not in US |
| + **** Can't derive functional traits to taxon; but a lot of constraints are taxonomic |
| + **** Characteristic data ... hard to obtain |
| + **** Ancillary db mined from literature on characteristics of species, mining data from these Floras |
| + **** Building an analysis that works off of gene sequencing ... e.g., by incorporating GenBank |
| + |
| + * Functional Traits Databases |
| + ** USDA Plants (tons of plants, taxonomic subspecies, ...) [http://plants.usda.gov/] |
| + |
| + * Manu |
| + ** Reconciling datasets |
| + *** Why don't datasets match, how to bring them "to the same level" |
| + ** Observations |
| + *** entities, context, methodology, unit, ..., representation |
| + *** e.g., observations of overhunting |
| + *** certain "functions" are called: e.g., rescaling, reprojecting, etc. |
| + *** how to represent these rules? ... |
| + **** A lot of discussion on transformation |
| + **** Mark wants to know how to do unit conversion |
| + |
| + * Shawn |
| + ** Onto stuff |
| + |
| + * Some datasets |
| + ** arc: lgcover2001 |
| + ** gce: PLT-GCED-0409 |
| + ** Niwot and Konza sites have data, e.g., that require multiple datasets to create an "integratable" source |
| + |
| + |
| + * Use case: Reconstructing an Experiment |
| + ** Data Request Form: |
| + **# Selected Sites with plants with only little or none secondary growth (shrubs) ... Herbacious dominated |
| + **# Replicated Plots (to compute means) |
| + **# Experimental manipulation of resources |
| + **# Species specific abundance in some way |
| + **# At first, wanted time series, but then couldn't do it -- chose the most recent year |
| + |
| + * Data integration |
| + ** Do a column-by-column merge |
| + *** for example r1(A, B) and r2(C, D) creates: r(A, B, C, D) |
| + *** or, if you know, e.g., that A and C are similar (e.g., Area), then: r(AC, S, B, D), where S is a lineage column |
| + |
| + !! Tuesday 8 March 2005 |
| At line 62 added 1 line. |
| + * [KR/SMS/Taxon Integration Breakout | KrSmsTaxon2005Mar8] |
