| At line 17 added 38 lines. |
| + __For discussion:__ |
| + |
| + !Getting Started Guide |
| + Please note any errors, any necessary additions or deletions, any other thoughts or feedback. |
| + |
| + !Actor Documentation |
| + I've noted some small questions and comments in red throughout.\\ |
| + In addition, some actors I could not draft copy for because I could not figure out how they worked. Those actors are marked with a TK beside their name in the table of contents. |
| + |
| + Additional things to look out for:\\ |
| + #Errors and misrepresentation of actor behavior,terminology, input, or output |
| + #Inappropriate context (i.e., an actor is described as a GEON actor, with contextual info about GEON, when its scope is much broader. Or, if an actor is described as a generic actor when it should be project-specific) |
| + #Actors that should be renamed |
| + #Areas where the docs are too explicit or not explicit enough. The docs are based on the user profiles found here: http://www.kepler-project.org/Wiki.jsp?page=KeplerUsers ), assuming that a user is at least a Quantitative Analyst. |
| + #Actor docs that are incomplete (the docs do not describe all of the actor functions) |
| + #Additional actors that should be noted in a particular actor doc (actors that have similar behavior, or that are commonly used in conjunction with the particular actor). |
| + #Any additional concerns or thoughts |
| + |
| + !Additional Actor doc issues to discuss:\\ |
| + #Documentation should be consistent with UI. Whatever convention is used for actor names and parameter names should be incorporated into the docs. Who will decide the standard and implement it in the UI? Who will do this for the docs? |
| + #Production of Actor docs/incorporation of docs into application. how will this be done? who will do it? Important that <p> are preserved and would like <tt> and <i> to be preserved as well for consistency/ease of recognition. |
| + #Currently, the beta 2 ontology contains 348 actors. Will any additional actors be included in the release? Will any of the existing actors be removed? |
| + |
| + !User Manual Outline\\ |
| + #Is this the type of document that is required?\\ |
| + #If so, what should be added to it? Removed? Reorganized? \\ |
| + #If not, what should the document look like/contain?\\ |
| + |
| + !Additional questions:\\ |
| + Which workflows will be included in the release? |
| + ''Note that the outline contains examples (particularly for the project-specific section), but its still unclear which of these will be finalized/included in the demos directory.'' |
| + |
| + !Additional thoughts about documentation.\\ |
| + Are other documents required? Anything else? \\ |
| + Who will be working on the docs after this meeting? |
| + ''Note that I'll have only about 20 hours after the meeting.'' |
| + |
| + |
