| Lines 13-28 were replaced by line 13 |
| - Teleconference: |
| - JK agreed that yes, Napier is considering that there are some assumptions/rules on how different |
| - |
| - groups (i.e. SEEK) would interpret the data from the schema. They will document these assumptions |
| - |
| - for later discussion. |
| - |
| - KU Email: |
| - The Assertion element name should be changed since it is already established as something |
| - |
| - different in Taxonomer. Perhaps something less ambiguous - Relationship, Link ...? |
| - |
| - Teleconference: |
| - Napier agrees that this is a problematic element name, but would prefer to address this issue |
| - |
| - after more discussion at the TDWG conference in October. |
| + ;Teleconference: JK agreed that yes, Napier is considering that there are some assumptions/rules on how different groups (i.e. SEEK) would interpret the data from the schema. They will document these assumptions for later discussion. |
| Lines 30-37 were replaced by line 15 |
| - KU Email: |
| - Metadata (and sub elements Creator and CreationTime) should be required |
| - |
| - Teleconference: |
| - Fine with Napier. |
| - |
| - KU Email: |
| - Define elements before they are referenced - so put Vouchers and Publications right after |
| + ;KU Email: The Assertion element name should be changed since it is already established as something different in Taxonomer. Perhaps something less ambiguous - Relationship, Link ...? |
| Line 39 was replaced by line 17 |
| - Metadata. |
| + ;Teleconference: Napier agrees that this is a problematic element name, but would prefer to address this issue after more discussion at the TDWG conference in October. |
| Lines 41-45 were replaced by line 19 |
| - Teleconference: |
| - Fine with Napier. |
| - |
| - KU Email: |
| - Add Repositories (before Vouchers) and AccordingTos (after Publications) and allow both of them to |
| + ;KU Email: Metadata (and sub elements Creator and CreationTime) should be required |
| Line 47 was replaced by line 21 |
| - be referenced. |
| + ;Teleconference: Fine with Napier. |
| Lines 49-50 were replaced by line 23 |
| - Teleconference: |
| - KU does not see these as elements receiving GUIDs, only elements that may be reused in a document. |
| + ;KU Email: Define elements before they are referenced - so put Vouchers and Publications right after Metadata. |
| Line 52 was replaced by line 25 |
| - Repositories sound fine to Napier, but they are not convinced that AccordingTos are an element that |
| + ;Teleconference: Fine with Napier. |
| Line 54 was replaced by line 27 |
| - will be reused much. KU would like AccordingTos, but does not see it as a key issue. We agreed to |
| + ;KU Email: Add Repositories (before Vouchers) and AccordingTos (after Publications) and allow both of them to be referenced. |
| Line 56 was replaced by lines 29-30 |
| - revisit this after more reaction at TDWG. |
| + ;Teleconference: |
| + KU does not see these as elements receiving GUIDs, only elements that may be reused in a document. Repositories sound fine to Napier, but they are not convinced that AccordingTos are an element that will be reused much. KU would like AccordingTos, but does not see it as a key issue. We agreed to revisit this after more reaction at TDWG. |
