|
Difference between
version 5
and
version 4:
| Lines 6-12 were replaced by lines 6-12 |
| - **1. Review existing data registries and supporting technologies.\\ |
| - **2. Perform cross-walk of registry elements from selected data registries.\\ |
| - **3. Evaluate capacity of a standardized data registry for meeting needs of broad biological sciences community.\\ |
| - **4. Assess usability of existing registries.\\ |
| - **5. Identify needed functionality for data registry search engines.\\ |
| - **6. Examine how existing data registries can support NEON and other national, continental, and global environmental observatory networks.\\ |
| - **7. Determine next steps for promoting data discovery in biology.\\ |
| + *1. Review existing data registries and supporting technologies.\\ |
| + *2. Perform cross-walk of registry elements from selected data registries.\\ |
| + *3. Evaluate capacity of a standardized data registry for meeting needs of broad biological sciences community.\\ |
| + *4. Assess usability of existing registries.\\ |
| + *5. Identify needed functionality for data registry search engines.\\ |
| + *6. Examine how existing data registries can support NEON and other national, continental, and global environmental observatory networks.\\ |
| + *7. Determine next steps for promoting data discovery in biology.\\ |
Back to Workshop On Data Discovery In The Biological Sciences February 792005,
or to the Page History.
|
