|
|||
|
Use Case 5: Display Connections To Synonymous Concepts (Statically)
Actors
DescriptionIt is part of the process of understanding the meaning of a concept, and the uses of taxonomic names in the taxonomic and ecological literature (including other databases), that one can trace its synonymy connections to other concepts. This "connectedness" among partially or entirely synonymous concepts also serves to reduce the redundancy of separate entries that can nevertheless stand for (virtually) identical meanings. Knowledge of concept synonymy connections can also assist a user in locating relevant specimens and diagnoses. These connections may be "expert-made" or probabilistically calculated. Typically they are circumscribed through the following relations: congruent, is included in, includes, overlaps, excludes (see http://www.bgbm.org/BioDivInf/Projects/MoreTax/standard_liste_en.htm). "Is included in" and "includes" are not considered the same as "is a child of" and "is a parent of" in this (synonymy) context. One species concept may for example be more inclusive in terms of its associated specimens than another species concept that refers to a subset of that larger set of specimens, without the latter being a "child" of the former.
Flow of Events
Pre-conditions
Basic Flow
Examples
Post-conditionsAgain, the concept "short-hands" displayed in the listing of concept synonymies should ideally indicate how much information is attached to the complete concept entries, e.g. whether they include specimen listings, or have been connected by "experts" to multiple alternative classifications.
Alternative Flows
Further DetailsSee other Use Cases involving or expanding on queries.
Non-functional RequirementsAn intelligent, interactively usable algorithm to achieve name-to-concept matching; and presumably a minimum set of expert-made connections.
IssuesSynonymy connections can sit on top of core taxonomic concepts, in the sense that various entities can agree about the validity of concepts yet disagree about their synonymy connections. This situation is more complicated for parent/child connections, where certain disagreements about connections amond parent and child concepts necessarily result in new parent concepts (...).
History
|
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under award 0225676. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recomendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation (NSF). Copyright 2004 Partnership for Biodiversity Informatics, University of New Mexico, The Regents of the University of California, and University of Kansas |