|
|||
|
Use Case 6: Display Connections To Parent Or Child Concepts (Statically)
Actors
DescriptionOften it is useful - again, for understanding the meaning of taxomomic perspectives and changes among them through time - to view the connections of a selected child concept (say, a species-level concept) to one or more respective parent concepts (e.g. the various genus-level concepts in which the species concept has been placed by different authors). Conversely, it is possible (at least in the taxonomic database world) to create a new parent concept on the basis of uniquely connecting various existing child concepts to it. These connections imply a certain "nestedness" (perhaps in the cladistic sense of an abstract, hypothetical ancestor), and are different from synonymy connections made among concepts assigned to the same level.
Flow of Events
Pre-conditions
Basic Flow
Examples
Post-conditionsAgain, the concept "short-hands" displayed in the listing of concept synonymies should ideally indicate how much information is attached to the complete concept entries, e.g. whether they include specimen listings, or have been connected by "experts" to multiple alternative classifications.
Alternative Flows
Further DetailsSee other Use Cases involving or expanding on queries.
Non-functional RequirementsAn intelligent, interactively usable algorithm to achieve name-to-concept matching; and presumably a minimum set of expert-made connections. Also, a practical understanding when reconnections among parent and child concepts, or additions of child concepts to and subtractions from parent concepts, necessarily result in new parent concepts.
IssuesA document on "stopping rules" for creating parent concepts on the basis of reconnected, newly added or subtracted child concepts (with real examples), is in preparation.
History
|
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under award 0225676. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recomendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation (NSF). Copyright 2004 Partnership for Biodiversity Informatics, University of New Mexico, The Regents of the University of California, and University of Kansas |