| Line 5 was replaced by line 5 |
| - ;Kepler Status:target user definition, no taxon specific topics at next meeting. will discuss API for Kepler to make integration easier. Look at future Kepler (non-SEEK) proposals. |
| + ;Kepler Status:target user definition, no taxon specific topics at next meeting. will discuss API for Kepler to make integration easier. Look at future Kepler (non-SEEK) proposals. Bridge different ITRs. Target audience for Kepler will probably expand dramatically. Laura thinks Kepler user is domain scientist __combined__ with a programmer. |
| Line 7 was replaced by line 7 |
| - ;Summary of Taxon Visualization Evaluation: January 23 of Martin's viz tool |
| + ;Kepler Actor: ENM workflow. Given a name, authority, return set of all names at specific rank below that. That list is then used to expand Digir query. Currently stubbed in - hardcodes and canned response, no TOS interaction. Just need to add 2 soap calls, then ready for ENM. Probably should have some interaction in 2 places: 1)allow to choose which concept to be root before traversing down to rank; 2) allow user to decide how to handle overlaps - selectively remove?. |
| Line 9 was replaced by line 9 |
| - ;ConceptMapper Demo, React (10-12): |
| + ;:Similarities between Taxon and SMS. Same thing, but basically all done with database in Taxon. May Meeting - Taxon hash out decisions on our interactivity needs, then present to larger group |
| At line 10 added 4 lines. |
| + ;:Check with Deana about use case for Biodiversity |
| + |
| + ;ConceptMapper Demo, React (10-12): import from __either__ TCS __or__ 3 tab delimited/csv files with specific fields. |
| + |
| Removed lines 19-20 |
| - |
| - |
| Line 23 was replaced by line 25 |
| - 12 Lunch for five people |
| + ;1-3.30 Taxon Tool Evaluation, Split into two rooms: |
| Line 25 was replaced by lines 27-29 |
| - ;1-3:30 Taxon Tool Evaluation, Split into two rooms: |
| + ;3.30-4.30 Summary of Taxon Visualization Evaluation: January 23 of Martin's viz tool |
| + See Laura's report in cvs at: |
| + Ecologists much more positive. Collection managers might benefit more from small plugin to Specify instead. Both groups really wanted some geographic functions integrated. |
| Lines 27-31 were replaced by line 31 |
| - |
| - |
| - ;3:30-4:30 session with Laura |
| - |
| - |
| + ;GUIDS:What gets a guid? Specimens - should go on biological object, not multiple treatments, preparations, etc. Possibly versions for different collection objects connected to same biological object. |
| Removed lines 43-44 |
| - |
| - |
| Lines 47-51 were replaced by line 45 |
| - ;Updates: |
| - |
| - ;GUIDS: |
| - |
| - ;Remaining Issues: |
| + ;GUIDS: See Jessie's powerpoint |
| Line 53 was replaced by line 47 |
| - |
| + ;Kepler: After stable, Taxon group play with Taxon actor. Non-interactive version. |
| Line 55 was replaced by lines 49-54 |
| - |
| + ;Remaining Issues: ESA (August 7-11) - will probably do something for booth |
| + ;:Wed, 22 Feb 2006 (16:00 GMT) Taxon call - paper topics |
| + ;:15 march 2006 (16:00 GMT) Taxon call |
| + ;:18 April 2006 (16:00 GMT) Taxon call |
| + ;: SEEK May meeting - 30 April - 5 May |
| + ;:Data - will put MSW 1993 and 2005 into TOS, and ConceptMapper, then someone (Nico?) will map between them. |
| Removed line 57 |
| - |
