This is version 4.
It is not the current version, and thus it cannot be edited.
[Back to current version]
[Restore this version]
Questions and Notes from the KR/SMS Breakouts at SEEK AHM 2006
- Can OBOE enable reasoning (e.g., to find inconsistencies) between domain extensions
- How to integrate SEEK taxonomic concepts for OBOE
- what are the issues?
- where does the connection go in OBOE (e.g., as classification elements)?
- what is being modeled in OBOE versus in tax-concepts
- What are the ways to leverage OBOE for domain extensions
- elaborate extension points explicitly
- allow one to create a new ontology that maps an existing domain ontology to OBOE
- domain extension mining
- demo of keyword and co-occurrence mining from corpus (eml text, textbook, papers)
- how generate from this information or extend approach to construct domain extensions
- visualize, summarize the data (in particular, a matrix of terms and their co-occurrence weight)
- LTER controlled vocabulary as a starting point
- obtain verb and adjective lists for keywords
- explore how verb phrases can be used to name the relations between entities/characteristics
- incorporate definitions from (bio) dictionaries, wordnet, encyclopedias (wikipedia), or glossaries for each entity
- pre-classify the entities into classes based on part-of-speech tags
- use look-up tables from common classes (measurement units, etc.)
- profile the keywords used within particular (sub) domains
- geospatial ontology extensions
|