Science Environment for Ecological Knowledge
Ecoinformatics site parent site of Partnership for Biodiversity Informatics site parent site of SEEK - Home
Science Environment for Ecological Knowledge









 

 

 



Status Report 18 October 2004

Difference between version 2 and version 1:

Removed line 11
- !!Bing Zhu
At line 12 added 34 lines.
+
+
+ !!Rod Spears
+
+ Completed tasks / bugs fixed
+ * Bug 1697 - Create a DarwinCore Actor
+ ** Completed task and added the Darwin Core to the search pane
+ * Added UI to search "all" or just one of the data types; added progressbar, added code so icon on the canvas turn read when loading data.
+
+
+ !!Serguei Krivov
+
+ Completed tasks / bugs fixed
+ * complete support for editing of rdfs:labels
+ * minor fixes of edit tool panel
+ * major rearrangement of KRPolicy and GUIPolicy interfases
+
+ Current tasks / bugs
+ * testing and preparing for the second alpha release of growl
+
+
+ !!Chad Berkley
+
+ Completed tasks / bugs fixed
+ * Worked with shawn to get the ontology driven dynamic actor library building system working.
+ * released kepler 1.0.0alpha3
+
+ Current tasks / bugs
+ * Working on debugging the tree rebuilder code so that all actors will be treated equally.
+ * Need to fix the bug in the simple search that causes it to miss non-entities.
+
+
+ !!Nico Franz
+
Lines 14-16 were replaced by line 47
- * Compeleted initial gwsdl for ecogrid registry service.
- * Had an initial implementation for ecogrid registry service.
- * Had a phone meeting woth Jing and Rod to discuss the registry design and implementation.
+ * attended TDWG New Zealand; presented paper on taxonomic concept relationships; participated in SEEK-relevant discussions
Lines 19-20 were replaced by lines 50-56
- * re-design the gwsdl and registry schema for ecogrid registry service based on ecogrid development team phone meeting.
- * re-implementation of ecogrid registry service.
+ * continuing to work on taxonomic concepts-GUID paper
+
+ Significant issues
+ * TDWG paper was very well received - no substantial criticisms. The Berlin Model team (who until now were the leading advocates on these issues) basically conceded that they hadn't considered some of my criticisms and ideas for improvement. I would now like to see these ideas end up in the TCS schema and will argue for that move again in Lawrence.
+
+
+ !!

Back to Status Report 18 October 2004, or to the Page History.